The species that are being discussed to be removed from the Endangered
Species list would not simply be "delisted" and then you can hunt them.
They would be down listed to "threatened", which is the category for
species who are out of immediate danger, but still need some type of
protection.
Although there is certainly a lot of concern over the possible delisting
of the species, it may be a very good political move. There is,
unfortunately, so much opposition to the ESA in both the House and
Senate - and we can rattle off some names of those who would like to see
the ESA go the way of the Carolina Parakeet or the Blue Pike (Helms,
Murkowski, Hatch, Young, et.al) - that choosing what species have made
significant progress enough to be downlisted can demonstrate that the
ESA REALLY works - and thus should be strengthened and kept in force.
Victoria
Kia hora te marino, kia whakapapa pounamu te moana, kia tere ai te
karohirohi i mua tonu i o koutou huarahi
May the calm be widespread, may the sea be as the smooth surface of the
greenstone, and may the rays of sunshine forever dance along your
pathway.
Maori Prayer
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 8 13:30:06 1998
From: "us" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: people as groups - gender and violence
Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 14:37:24 -0500
charset="iso-8859-1"
>>Women have always practiced domination and exploitation
>>>>against others if they were living in societies were men were
>>>>equally disfunctional
>>
>>Will, where do you get your facts to support the claim you make in your
>>first statement?
>
>I was quoting from, and giving a rave review of vera's post, and probably
>should have made that clearer. I can think of lots examples where this is
>true though. Serbian women blocking food delivery to moslems and croats in
>bosnia comes to mind as a recent sad and graphic case. I think of queen
>elizabeth I, or catherine the great or maggie thatcher, but none of these
>examples proves that it is ALWAYS the situation, but it is hard for me to
>picture a society in which the men practiced domination and exploitation
>and the women have absolutely no part in or of it. Can you think of an
>example of such a society?
>
> will
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
Will,
Thanks for your reply and I do agree that both men and women have played
their parts in the history of domination and its effects. I was not trying
to say that women have never dominated or that they are innocent in the eyes
of history, and I am trying to be careful of making general statements and
general assumptions. Thank you very much for your reply. I think we can all
learn alot from each other. As much as we cannot entirely blame the male
gender for our past history, we also cannot shut our eyes to the past
histories of both sexes and their impact on the world today.....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: will bason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Thursday, May 07, 1998 9:24 AM
>>Subject: Re: people as groups - gender and violence
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I disagree with you in the following way:
>>>>Women have always practiced domination and exploitation
>>>>against others if they were living in societies were men were
>>>>equally disfunctional. This is not to say that women have not
>>>>been oppressed based on their category as women, but
>>>>that women are part of a variety of categories simultaneously,
>>>>and as such they have acted as both oppressed and oppressors,
>>>>both as victims of violence and as perpetrators.
>>>>
>>>(snip)
>>>
>>>Vera, thank you very much for this and the well reasoned, balanced, kind
>>>hearted and articulate essay that followed. I honestly feel some change
>>>and healing taking place in me simply from reading it. It makes me a
>>>little more hopeful for our species. In addition to our violent
tendencies,
>>>we all so share with each other some very lovely qualities that make our
>>>faults worth working on.
>>>
>>> will bason
>>>
>>>
>>>*********************
>>>Will Bason
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>http://www.swva.net/taonow/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>