>A SUCCESSFUL GUIDE TO PARENTING
>or
>How To Destroy Your Child's Original Nature And Replace It With A
>Societally Acceptable Robotic Personality
>
>by Jason Williams
>
>ORIGINAL NATURE
>
>All societies clearly believe that the original true nature of children
>must be controlled to produce a socially acceptable adult. Thus parents
>control and mould their children in certain ways, so as to produce a
>child that will be accepted as part of the society into which they are
>arbitrarily born.
>
>This is the crux of all of humanities problems. From birth onwards,
>parents consciously and unconsciously suppress and destroy the true
>nature of their children.
>
>A child is born into an arbitrary culture, which has its own specific
>morals, mores, expectations, beliefs, fashions, ideas, goals,
>stereotypes, personas, roles, acceptable behaviour etc. etc. etc. etc.
>
>The primary device of control is the �self�. The parents and others,
>impart the concept of �self� into the child. Once the child believes in
>the existence of its-�self�, the child can be manipulated to fit the
>mould of the particular �self� that the parents and society find
>acceptable and agreeable.  The goal is to make the child believe he is
>the self.
>
>The parents manipulate the child's original nature with the intention
>that they love the child and are only doing �what is best for them�,
>because the parents �know better than they do, we have experience.� The
>parents figure that it would be better to be dead than not be accepted
>by society.
>
>Eventually, the original nature of the child will be moulded into a
>completely �mature� adult. That is, the child will have forgotten who
>they were originally, and instead fully believe that they are indeed the
>personality or �self� that has been forced upon them by the culture and
>parents.
>
>Depending on the culture into which they were arbitrarily born, they may
>be a Masai tribesman, a Chinese peasant, or a �modern� American or
>Australian. The contrast between these matured personalities, from
>vastly different cultures, is stark. A Masai tribesman who is brought
>into the western world, will not act in way that is considered �mature�,
>he may be considered completely crazy. What it is to be �mature� is
>chosen by each culture.
>
>
>SUPPRESSION AND CONTROL OF ORIGINAL NATURE
>
>The main task for the parents in the first 7 years is to repress the
>child into a socially acceptable robot. This usually starts with the
>biological/physical side of things.
>The child is taught how to eat CORRECTLY, taught which parts of the body
>to hide(clothes) or show off(makeup/hairdo), taught which parts of the
>body are not ok to touch, taught how to speak ACCEPTABLY. Acceptance is
>the reason, even though it is said otherwise, society does not like nor
>want individuals. They disrupt the hive from FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY and
>EFFICIENTLY.
>
>There are many different ways to control and suppress the child. Without
>a self, the child can only be controlled through direct physical
>intervention. Once the self has been formed however, it is possible to
>use the mind to control. At first the mind is too individual for
>control, so a form of physical punishment must be used in conjunction
>with verbal commands, to reinforce the power of the mind control.
>
>
>Here are some examples of child suppression techniques, and the
>psychology behind them.
>
>
>BRIBERY : "Do this and get this"
>
>Using material gain or loss to control the kids. Using the biological
>desires of children to control them, like training a dog.
>e.g.
>"I'll give you an ice-cream if you stop rubbing your penis, ok"
>or
>�If you don�t stop touching mummy there, I�ll never buy you an ice cream
>again�
>
>
>
>GUILT/SHAME/EMBARASSMENT : "That's wrong, people won't like you"
>
>Using the moral and norm code relevant to the particular
>socio-cultural-paridigm of the time and place. The Good/Bad morals/mores
>game together with the hierarchical rule of majority(norms), combines to
>form a potent force against which the child is set.
>e.g.
>"Don't pull your dress up in the middle of the shopping centre!" -
>often the tone of voice is enough to imbue the embarrassment, but only
>if the child has an understanding of shame.
>
>
>
>ACCEPTANCE GAMES : �You�re different to everybody else, no-one will like
>you, you have to make yourself more like us�
>
>This works on the idea that to be different is wrong or bad. In later
>life, especially in the teenage years, this comes back with a vengeance,
>this time it is �self� motivated however.
>e.g.
>"This is exellent! Its great! EVERYONE else likes it, I can't understand
>why YOU don't like it"
>
>
>
>PHYSICAL FORCE :  �Slap!�
>
>When nothing else works, many resort to pure physical violence. Of
>course no-one would call it violence now would they. When a husband hits
>their wife its considered violence, yet the mother or father can hit the
>innocent child with the guise of love �we�re only doing it because we
>love you�.
>
>
>SOCIAL OUTCOME
>
>A lot of people who I tell all this to, don�t understand what they have
>lost. They have no clue as to why what I�m saying is of prime
>importance, and that it has implications to the deepest nature within
>all of us.
>
>This is because most of them are mature. They believe who they are is
>who they really are. They�ve lost their nature and covered it over with
>socially acceptable personalities. They�ve done such a good job that
>they don�t even know what was destroyed.
>
>Social conditioning runs so very deep. It affects even our most subtle
>actions.
>Before you go out, you brush your hair. Does a five year old brush their
>hair at all costs before leaving the house? You tell me �It is to
>untangle the knots in your hair it has practical value� you say. Why
>then did you have a huge mop of hair in the 70�s and a puffy boof head
>in the 80�s, just like everybody else? You were just like everyone else,
>you followed them blindly, you were so blind you didn�t even know you
>were following them.  You say �Hair style is so insignificant, it has no
>true value�, then don�t comb your hair for the next month, I don�t care
>if you�re going to a wedding, don�t comb it!.  You say �I like to comb
>my hair.�, ok, comb it in the opposite direction to the way you usually
>do, comb it forward instead of back.
>�But I like it the way it is� you say, funny how everyone back in the
>70�s liked it the same way you did, and how everyone in the 90�s finds
>your hair acceptable now.
>�Don�t be so serious!�,you stammer , ok, I�ll die my hair red and boof
>it into a clown hair do, would that be better?
>
>When you�re in a train or bus, you try not to make too much eye contact
>with others. You wear perfume and aftershave to impress others, to be
>accepted. You wear suits to work, and stupid ties. Your dancing in clubs
>is acting. You become an actor to pick up the opposite sex. You buy the
>latest expensive clothes in acceptable styles. You talk all day long in
>small talk. You can�t be quiet around someone without feeling
>uncomfortable.You pretend you don�t shit. Women can�t be seen with new
>born baby hanging out of there vaginas. Mummy and daddy never have sex.
>Big brother doen�t masturbate
>
>Our society, our �modern� society is based on the same underlying
>suppressive ideals that we can all clearly see in �Leave it to Beaver�
>and the 1950�s in general. All society is comparable to the Victorian
>era, do you think they knew they were suppressed? They covered table
>legs with table cloths so that a man would not be reminded of the bare
>legs of a woman.
>
>The suppression is so deeply ingrained that we cannot in any way act
>spontaneously while we are around other humans. Do you make faces in the
>bathroom mirror, when no one is looking?
>
>There are laws against nudity, our natural physical state. I think that
>sums our whole society up perfectly. CONTROL YOUR-SELF!
>
>
>
>WHAT PURPOSE DOES SUPPRESSION HAVE?
>
>Government, commerce, schooling, military and employment all work on the
>same principles. The child who is originally very self sufficient
>becomes sub-servient to the masses of popular pathology.
>
>We are controlled in early life so that we can be controlled our entire
>lives. By making children NORMAL, we can all be kept on mutual terms.
>This allows control.
>
>If a large majority of women didn�t believe that they needed to be thin,
>weight loss companies would go out of business. If no-one thought money
>had any value then those who are rich would have no control. If men were
>not attracted to barely clothed women, then women in short skirts would
>have no control over men. If people weren�t afraid of death religion
>would have no power.
>
>The people doing the controlling, everyone who takes part in society,
>want security above all else. They want to be able to pre-empt every
>situation. Natural humans cannot be pre-empted, they are sponataneous.
>Cultured people can be pre-empted, but only if they are all within the
>confines of an accepted standard.
>
>Jason

Joe E. Dees
Poet, Pagan, Philosopher


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access your e-mail anywhere, at any time.
Get your FREE BellSouth Web Mail account today!
http://webmail.bellsouth.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to