Come on - this conversation has little to do with gorilla welfare or
wildlife and a whole lot to do with chest-beating racial chauvanism and
first world neuroses.
Let's get to the point - who are threatenting the Gorillas in this context?
No killing is justifiable, Hutu, Tutsi, or Tourist. There is nothing worse
or better about killing a New Zealand tourist bride than systematically
smashing 250,000 Tutsi childrens heads against a wall or impaling 100,000
Tutsi school girls on rough wooden stakes.
I want to see Nicole give an informed defence of Hutu rebel Gorilla
protection, rather than the more likely scenario that the Gorillas have
been systematically slaughtered for meat. Gorilla welfare or guerilla
warfare?
a bride's blood does not secure a Gorilla's life
tough love is true love, Nicole XXX - Chris
