The Laws of Thought are as follows:
If A, Then A
If Not A, Then Not A
Either A or Not A
Not (Both A And Not A)
How can these rules, drawn from, reflective of, and uncontradicted by our common
reality possibly "oppress" anyone more than anyone else? It would rather seem that
consistent application of them can further the freedom which springs from better
understanding, and the optimization of good choice consideration which flows from
that. They don't appear to have any gender or ethnic preferences or inhibitions which
I can see. If someone else can see these markers, please point them out to me. I
cannot conceive of the male or female, black, red, yellow. brown or white, gay or
straight, mind as an exclusive haven for either Reason or Unreason, Rationality or
Irrationality.
Joe E. Dees
Poet, Pagan, Philosopher
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access your e-mail anywhere, at any time.
Get your FREE BellSouth Web Mail account today!
http://webmail.bellsouth.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
