Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:02:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jayne S Docherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lea smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Woodley
Perhaps Wood Lee *is* trolling this list. However, we do not know that
for sure and by immediately dismissing his postings we run the risk of
creating a closed environment in which we only "talk to ourselves".
I decided to assume that Wood's communication skills were simply a bit
deficient -- i.e., he is not very good at the type of discussion that we
appreciate in this environment (perhaps because they are not comfortable
for him) -- but that his intentions were good. So, I chose to throw
him a lifeline before he drowned in the ocean of our displeasure. ;-)
That
is why I tried to respond by answering Wood's questions and posing a few
of my own for him.
So, how about it Wood? If you are serious about discussing these issues,
let's hear from you...
Jayne
Good points, Jayne. Let's hear from you Wood.
lea
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 20 13:21:38 MDT 1995
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 15:22:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jayne S Docherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Carol Meeds WPB 407-433-2650 x 113 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Woodley
In-Reply-To: <A100ZVSMKTG15*/R=WPB1/R=A1/U=MEEDS_C/@MHS>
On Thu, 20 Apr 1995, Carol Meeds WPB 407-433-2650 x 113 wrote:
> It wouldn't occur to me to find a male discussion list and troll.
> I don't think I even want to lurk. It is now intriguing. How
> about it? Has anyone checked out a male discussion list? lurked?
> Trolled? Montague's new _Rachael_ would be good flame bait, I
> think. (He talks about the deminishing virility of men.)
>
> Carol Meeds
> Jupiter, Florida
Who has time? Who cares? Why bother?
Jayne
