I have a very low sympathy level for "Angry White Males" who whine about "reverse discrimination". Most white males seem to believe that since they didn't personally CAUSE the problem, they should not be called upon to help fix it, by standing aside with no whining so that a non-white- male may have an opportunity. I still see little evidence that anything but white males dominate the highest places in all the professions and income brackets. This is NOT the same thing as saying that no white males are at the low end of the opportunity spectrum. I believe Michael brought up the issue of class. There is a definite correlation between class and race/gender. The poverty levels are populated mostly by women and children of all races, and men of color. Perhaps it is no more "fair" that what happens to women of color is starting to happen to white men. This IS a consequence of trying to balance opportunity. It really is not fair for the low end of the economic spectrum to be mostly populated by women and people of color, which means there is a strange absence of white men. So, now we have a big cat/dog fight on our hands, and we debate who has the most right to win. IMHO, we should be taking a look at the basis of the economic theory that runs this place. This basis is called "scarcity"--which means that we have accepted that there are not enough resources to go around; therefore a certain %age of the population will experience lack and scarcity, while others enjoy abundance and wealth. I was shocked to find this scarcity principle as the fundamental theory of economics. Enter race and gender for the populations at the bottom, and Affirmative Action as our only way to try to distribute scarcity fairly among all races and genders. As long as we subscribe to the scarcity theory, we have to find the reprobates to be the have-nots. This culture has selected women and people of color as the primary reprobates. Seems there really are TWO issues: women and people of color as reprobates; and the scarcity principle that powers class. If we get rid of the scarcity principle, will we have ended race/gender discrimination? If we manage to end race/gender discrimination, will that get rid of the scarcity principle? _________________________________________________________________________ Mary Simmons U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division Albuquerque, New Mexico (505)262-5330 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
power communication
Mary C. Simmons, Hydrologic Assistant, Albuquerque, NM Tue, 25 Apr 1995 11:36:13 -0600
- power communicatio... lea smith
- Re: power com... Michael Golden
- Re: power com... Michael Golden
- Re: power com... Mary C. Simmons, Hydrologic Assistant, Albuquerque, NM
- Re: power com... Joy Williams
- Re: power com... Rose Zubizarreta
- Re: power com... Faith Freewoman
- Re: power com... Kylie Matthews
- Re: power com... Kylie Matthews
- Re: power com... Kylie Matthews
- Re: power com... Kylie Matthews
- Re: power com... jonesli
- Re: power com... Michael Yount
- Re: power com... Bertina Miller
