The danger of trying to assure safe food by imposing limits to pollution is
also the danger implied in the assessment of the risks accompanying this
pollution.  This danger is described in a paragraph of the article :
"Ethical Hazards of Risk Assessment" by Peter Montague :

"But risk assessment is now embedded in our environmental laws at the
federal and state levels in a way that guarantees that the "rights" of
industrial poisoners will be protected by the apparatus of the state while
citizens will be first disempowered and then physically harmed by the risk
assessors' work. Risk assessors are now in the position of the conductors
and engineers who kept the trains running on time to the death camps in
Nazi Germany to minimize discomfort to their passengers --they are just
doing a job, honorably and to the best of their ability, but the final
result of every professional risk assessor's work is the destruction of the
natural environment, one decision at a time, and the relentless spread of
sickness throughout the human and wildlife populations."  The complete
article is presented at the ZERO web site.

What could further happen when production continues close to the crisis
limits of pollution? Because of the increasing sophistication and
refinement of pollutants in their effects on genes and cells, any pollution
beyond the crisis limit could wipe out the population in particular
sections of a town, over a period that might shorten in time. These
pollutants could also blind this population or deform them either mentally
or physically otherwise, over the same period.  Such pollution could be
turned into leaks and become arms in fights between gangs, cartels or
groups formed by different criteria than the previous two.  "La guerre des
boutons" serait devenue la guerre des ordures.

There does not seem to be another theory, to pull producers away from the
officially accepted levels of pollution and to assure safe food, according
to the words of Klaus T�pfer, executive director of the UN Environment
Programme and formerly Germany's Environment Minister.

In the "Newsweek" of September 27, 1999, an interview with Mr. T�pfer is
presented on the last page, 76.  He describes the ecological crisis as
worsening globally.  He ends his description with : "Postponing action is
no longer an option". His answer to the question : "What kind of action is
needed?" is : "We need much more comprehensive, integrated policymaking."
"International Institutions, governments, the private sector,
nongovernmental organizations, the scientific community - they must learn
to work more closely."

These are the words of someone who does not know a solution to a problem.
When a solution is known, policies are applied in practises, such as the
management of the costs of living. All these organisations then
automatically work closely to apply the solution globally, out of
necessity.know the theory that offers a solution.

In "Le Monde" of the week-end of 6 and 7 November, 1999 an article
indicates that experiments in the European Union supported by the European
Commission demonstrate that harvests deminish with 80 grammes per square
meter, every time the number of diverse specimen is divided by two.  The
management of the costs of living would enhance biodiversity because every
difference among produce could have a commercial value in maintaining the
integrity of human nature.  This consequence is further explained at the
ZERO web site.

WASHINGTON, DC, November 12, 1999 (ENS) - Renewable energy and energy
efficiency are the common elements in four new projects approved in October
by the U.S. Initiative on Joint Implementation. This agency works
internationally to encourage the broader use of energy efficiency, new
technologies, and sustainable development with the goal of reducing
greenhouse gas production and preventing global warming.  Copyright
Environment News Service (ENS) 1999

Without a demand for products produced with these new technologies, the
encouragement will lack for producers to apply these ecological
technologies.  -  This was demonstrated in the case of "Van Leer's
Vatenfabriek", in Amstelveen, the Netherlands.  They had bought an
invention to make plastics biodegradable to a certain degree.  They could
not sell the plastic made with it, because no utiliser wanted to pay the
higher price to recover the investment made in the invention and to recover
the costs to search for and to develop the tools and techniques to produce
this biodegradable plastic.  -  Producers have no interests to apply
ecological technologies or to  search for them, as long as they cannot pass
the costs of research and development on to the consumer.  A sustained
demand from consumers managing their costs of living will raise the
interest of producers to apply and to search for ecological technologies.
The first ones to offer products made with these new technologies would be
able to conquer a large part of the market of these consumers.

The capacity to deduct costs from taxable income makes the consumer able to
assume, with his and her income, responsibility for the integrity of human
nature of this and following generations.  Consumers would share this
accounting capacity with producers.  The socio-economic power would be
shared among the social power of income of producers, Yang and the economic
power of expense of consumers, Yin.

I asked the speakers at the conference "La securit� alimentaire" for their
support of the "Bahia project".

Would you be good to express your support for the "Bahia project" ?  You
can get to it at the ZERO web site : http://freezone.exmachina.net/ZERO,
via the table of contents of the English text.  "An ecological version of
the free market economy" presents the essentials of the management of the
costs of living.

Brussels, November 25, 1999     W.A. de Bruyn


With sincerity and its feeling,

Wim A. de Bruyn
Founder
ZERO, association of consumers maintaining their integrity with their income
45 rue Alfred Giron
B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Tel. : **32 (2) 648 56 95
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZERO web site : http://freezone.exmachina.net/ZERO


Reply via email to