FYI.

Stefanie Rixecker
ECOFEM Coordinator

------- Forwarded message follows -------

From: Dr Margrit Shildrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Could you please post the following call for papers which may be of
interest to some readers of the SWIP listserv.If
you have any questions about this please let me know.

many thanks,

Margrit Shildrick

CALL FOR PAPERS

We are seeking papers of up to 7000 words for a new book  - Rethinking
Feminist Bioethics: The Challenge of the Postmodern - to be edited by
Margrit Shildrick and Roxanne Mykitiuk. Contributions are invited from
all disciplinary backgrounds including legal studies, health sciences,
womens studies, and science and technology, as well as philosophy.
Papers may include empirical or theoretical issues relating to
postmodernist feminist perspectives on bioethics. Contributors will be
expected to clearly address the difference that postmodernism can and
does make to bioethics, although they may have reservations about its
adequacy.

350 word abstracts or draft papers to hand must be received by 27 April
2001.
All proposals should be submitted by email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Routledge has expressed initial interest publishing such a collection.


Details of proposal:

This will be the first collection on feminist bioethics that confronts
the implications of recent theoretical advances in postmodernism,
together with, where appropriate, the radically unsettling effects of
biotechnology in the era of postmodernity. It is the editors' contention
that feminist bioethics in general, although highly effective in its
critique of mainstream masculinist ethical paradigms - arising
particularly form consequentialism, deontology, and to some extent from
virtue ethics - has remained largely closed to alternative models that
radically contest and deconstruct not just the form, but the ground
itself on which ethical decisions are assumed to be based. Where the
feminst ethics of care, for example, was initially a highly significant
breakthrough that mobilised new ways of thinking about the relations
that underlie bioethics, it has over the years become somewhat
entrenched as a focus of feminist thought. In our view, the area of
bioethics, in particular, has become characterised by a number of
largely unproblematised concepts that act to define and limit the
parameters of enquiry, rather than opening up the field to new
theoretical and practical developments. At a time when the conventional
notions of the body, the subject, consent and autonomy, the nature of
the human, and indeed the meaning of ethics itself, are all being deeply
contested, it seems to us that feminist bioethics is increasingly unable
to answer to the needs of the new century. It is almost as though
nothing had changed either practically or theoretically in the last
decade or so that would test the adequacy of earlier models. In
consequence, feminist bioethics seems to have little new to say about
the most urgent issues, many of which would have been inconceivable even
as little as a few years ago.

It is within this context that Rethinking Feminist Bioethics intends to
embrace a very different set of theoretical approaches that reflect the
radical changes that have already taken place, and which continue to
develop. It asks what difference does postmodernism and postmodernity
make to the way in which we frame bioethics, and what are the
implications in the substantive arena? In place of a homogenising
tendency that belies the avowed feminist sensitivity to difference, the
collection will be open to the fluidity and multiplicity that
characterises postmodernist thinking. The point is not to replace
existing models as though there could be a successor ethics, but to open
them up to critique, and suggest that alternative approaches might
better serve the ethical agenda. Nor should it be supposed that a
postmodernism approach is relevant only to those questions where the
material circumstances themselves are characteristic of postmodernity -
as, for example, in the areas of genetic engineering, or
xenotransplantation. On the contrary, we want to push for a
reconsideration of all ethical concerns in light of postmodernist
insights. The ethics of the ordinary, everyday ways in which our bodies
are treated are as much subject to critical reflection as the most
high-tech procedure. What is at stake throughout is a reconceived
understanding of what it is to be an embodied human subject engaged as
an actor in a moral landscape, but one that takes none of those terms
for granted. The lack of stable givens, the fluid materiality and
temporality, the constructed nature of both bodies and selves, and the
uncertainty associated with postmodernism do not disqualify it from the
ethical arena, as many modernists suppose, but call up the need to
fundamentally rethink what counts as ethics. The purpose of this book is
explore these issues in the context of a bioethics - an ethics of the
body - that is adequate both to feminist thinking and to the broad area
of biomedicine.
Some sample questions for consideration:
 - How does the concept of undecidability lend itself to a substantive
bioethics?
 - If both bodies and selves are discursive constructions, what is the
place of moral agency in a substantive bioethics?
 - What specific challenges does the operation of advanced biotechnology
pose to a conventional ethics grounded on the notion of a securely
embodied self?
 - What is at stake for feminism in contesting its own orthodoxies and
rethinking bioethics?
 - Could a reconceived ethics of care operate within a postmodernist
framework?
 - Given that bioethics is widely subject to legal formalisation, what
are the implications of an openess to the postmodernist perspective?
 - In what way do certain unstable forms of embodiment - such as
HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis, ME, and others - already contest the
adequacy of conventional bioethics?

Rationale for inclusion:
 The main criterion for inclusion of specific chapters in the collection
is that contributors should be able and willing to engage with the
theoretical advances - and where applicable, the substantive
consequences - of postmodernist modes of analysis. We do not expect
uniform acceptance of the efficacy of such analyses, but rather a
familiarity with them that allows the author to reconsider the issues in
hand. Selected papers will be expected to display global scope,
attention to cultural differences and clear feminist input. The latter
could be demonstrated in a number of ways: a) development of a feminist
ethical response to the new biotechnological advances which may or may
not fall within the conventional area of biomedicine; b) critique of
masculinist approaches to bioethics, centring on a specifically feminist
engagement with  postconventional and postmodernist approaches; c)
rethinking of issues that are particular to women - such as concerns
around reproduction, fertility, sexuality and so on. We do not envisage
that all contributors will define themselves primarily as bioethicists,
but we do expect that the question of ethics will be treated with
rigour, rather than simply implied.

 As the aim of the book is to unsettle the unproblematised certainties
of a feminist bioethics establishment that has largely ignored
postmodernism, contributors should be prepared to offer some degree of
explanation of unfamiliar terms, rather than assuming extensive
knowledge of pomo theory. Similarly, given that readers will come from a
wide range of discourses, any technical language should be adequately
introduced.

 All papers should be either original or have had very limited
publication. Expanded versions of relevant papers given at the FAB
Conference in London 2000 are very welcome provided that they have not
been published elsewhere.
--- End Forwarded Message ---


----------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dr Margrit Shildrick
SURI Research Fellow
Staffordshire University
and
Honorary Research Fellow
University of Liverpool.
------- End of forwarded message -------

************************************
Dr. Stefanie S. Rixecker, Senior Lecturer
Environmental Management & Design Division
Lincoln University, Canterbury
PO Box 84
Aotearoa New Zealand
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: 64-03-325-3841
************************************

Reply via email to