Why did she call her book "Living HIStory?" Is it because HERstory -- the true representation of American women in large enought numbers to affect and protect their country and world has not yet been a topic of focus for Hillary?
http://www.geocities.com/valleyofthepols/livingherandhisstory.html According to this site, like the heroine of Jackie Susann's novels, Hillary Clinton's plight and role has thus far really been quite sad. It seems that she and the male-dominated media are all to willing to focus on her to use and isolateher and ignore other women - both in the US, like Carol Mosely Braun, and outside the US, like the far more successful than US-women women Presidents and Prime Ministers of Scandinavia and Europe, like those of Wales, Scotland, Germany as well as Costa Rica's Vice-President, India's Congress Party Leader Sonia Gandhi, and Parite Authoress Sylviane Agacinski of France. These many others appear to have both have a stronger emphasis on global sisterhood and better cooperation from many men of many parties -- including many pro-feminist and equally famous husbands. But as central as she is to the problems of American women's activism,Hillary isn't all to blame. A growing number of people feel the US focus on Hillary while it simultaneously ignores gender reparation/ adequate standards ( at least 37% i.e. 75% of 50-50) of representation, equal presence on tickets, and fairness to ALL women, owed by still quite sexist-US male politicans and corporate super-dominator election patriarchs, is distracting and co-opting the all too self-divided US women's groups and leadership in all groups and parties, failing to respect and learn from progress in Europe and other places, and allowing too many to ignore Nane Annan's and her husband Kofi's UN's dangerous lag on the balance of gender.as a central problem urgently threatening the whole world. Need a new email address that people can remember Check out the new EudoraMail at http://www.eudoramail.com
