It is interesting that from a simple question can come many points of views 
and sometimes the answers don't really even answer the question.  Of course 
this is common sense, especially from the perspective that the question is 
rather broad and it is being posed to scientists who tend to think more 
abstractly.  I just find it interesting to read various perspectives that 
come from a broad question and we get a sense of how many different angles 
there are to a problem.  It is especially helpful to read responses that are 
within a context of how the question is being addressed by the person 
responding (e.g., "From a purely pro-environmental standpoint...").

I'm curious as to how well the answers posted are matching what Leslie is 
hoping to get as an answer...  Perhaps she left it broad to see the wide 
variety of responses she may get, or perhaps she'll need to refine her 
question more...

As for my own thoughts on the question - the phrase "power the world" gives 
me difficulty in answering the question without launching into a long essay. 
Considering this question from a "manmade" standpoint, we have to consider 
all of the abililties (e.g., economic, political) of various countries to 
power themselves so that the whole world may be powered.  So, are we talking 
about what is most feasible in terms of each country being able to optimize 
its power and yet remain environmentally conscious?  If so, that means many 
different powering systems that is achievable (feasible) for each country. 
Or are we leaping years into the future to what may be a single, most 
feasible and environmentally-friendly power system for the entire world?  If 
so, then I like the answer of Steve Kunz in that the solar power from the 
sun could eventually become technologically feasible in a broad sense.

Jill

>
> At 05:29 AM 2/8/2006, Leslie Mertz wrote:
>>I got an interesting question yesterday. From an environmental point
>>of view, what is the best, yet still feasible, way to power the
>>world? Any thoughts?
>>
>>Leslie Mertz, Ph.D.
>>science writer/author, educator
> 

Reply via email to