This hit home for me, felt compelled to share......it comes from Rick =
Reis, Ph.d. at Atanford U.

For feedback his e-mail is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks.

Mike Nolan

Folks:

The posting below looks at the benefits of using technology before and =
after, but not during class time.  It is by Jos=E9 Bowen =
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), dean, Algur H. Meadows Chair and professor of music, =
Meadows School of the Arts, Southern Methodist University. It is #36 in =
a series of selected excerpts from the NT&LF newsletter reproduced here =
as part of our "Shared Mission Partnership." NT&LF has a wealth of =
information on all aspects of teaching and learning. If you are not =
already a subscriber, you can check it out at [http://www.ntlf.com/] The =
on-line edition of the Forum--like the printed version - offers =
subscribers insight from colleagues eager to share new ways of helping =
students reach the highest levels of learning. National Teaching and =
Learning Forum Newsletter, Volume 16, Number 1, December 2006.=A9 =
Copyright 1996-2006. Published by James Rhem & Associates, Inc. All =
rights reserved worldwide. Reprinted with permission.

Regards,

Rick Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UP NEXT: Supporting and Retaining Early-career Faculty

Tomorrow's Teaching and Learning

--------------------------------------- 2,440 words =
------------------------------------


      Teaching Naked: Why Removing Technology from your Classroom Will =
Improve Student Learning

Flashy powerpoints with video and synchronous e-conferences are =
impressive, but the best reason to adopt technology in your courses is =
to increase and improve your naked, untechnological face-to-face =
interaction with students.  Technology is often accused of pushing =
people further apart (the interaction is really with a computer screen =
and not another human being, they say) but a few minutes of questions at =
the end of an hour covering material from behind a podium is hardly an =
interactive experience either.  However, simple, new technologies can =
greatly increase your students' engagement outside of the classroom and =
thus prepare them for real discussions (even in the very largest =
classes) by providing content and assessment before class time. The =
goal, in other words, is to use technology to free yourself from the =
need to "cover" the content in the classroom, and instead use class time =
to demonstrate the continued value of direct student to faculty =
interaction and discussion.

Most of the ideas listed here are aimed at medium or large courses (20 =
students and above) where lecturing remains the easy choice and =
powerpoint has become the most abused new technology.  If we believe =
that the value of a residential college experience consists largely of =
the human interaction between professors and students, then we should =
maximize that experience.   Better online courses are coming and =
consumers and legislators will continue to put money where the best =
learning is.  Residential colleges will always be more expensive, so =
there should also be a demonstrable learning benefit.  Technology will =
surely be a key component of all future higher education, but we need to =
rethink how we use technology inside as well as outside of the =
classroom.

As young teachers, almost all of us over-prepared for class with more =
content-specific lecture notes than we could ever deliver coherently. =
All of us have also had the unexpected and exquisite student epiphany =
that usually occurs when we abandon the script and follow our instincts =
or a student question.  The best teaching moments do not happen when we =
are worried about making sure we do not forget a detail.  These new =
technologies allow faculty to abandon this tyranny of content (at least =
during class time), but they will also require us to rethink our use of =
class time.  I'll return to this at the later, but I strongly endorse =
under-preparing for class; it will lead to your best teaching moments =
though it will feel a bit like teaching naked.

Use Email to Create More Class Time

If you need to reschedule the midterm or change a reading, do not take =
valuable class time to make announcements that some students will copy =
down and most will forget. Lists of announcements are time consuming and =
ineffective.  Email is a great way to communicate with your students and =
save class time for something better. Technology makes it easier to =
provide an email or handout with the complete details; For maximum =
effectiveness, limit announcements to one highlight.

Imagine my surprise when I first read on a student evaluation: "This =
professor emails me several times a week and it shows he really cares =
about his teaching."  Student perceptions of your enthusiasm and =
dedication are tied to their engagement in the subject.  They like =
getting email from you, and you immediately seem more open, accessible, =
friendly and caring.

Second, if you forget to mention some vital information in class, simply =
email all of your students after class.  Again, students like this and =
it reinforces what every campus has been trying to do: to connect =
learning with the entire college and life experience.  Email is a great =
way to remind students that they are responsible for the learning and =
that they should still be learning even when they leave the classroom.

Third, you can guide your students' time outside of the classroom by =
providing timely reminders of key themes in the reading or connecting =
classroom topics to current events.  Students always learn better when =
they perceive that the material is relevant and most of us see =
connections to our work periodically in the news.  Since mentioning a =
recent news item might divert us away from other course content during =
class time, we sometimes skip it, but email is the perfect way to draw =
attention to a news story immediately, as it happens.

Most universities now have some sort of course management system that =
automatically creates emails lists for every course, but another way to =
reach your students is to create a Facebook site for yourself.  (Go to =
Facebook.com and follow the instructions.) All of your students are =
already in this virtual community and asking them to join a class group =
creates a virtual community where they already live; posting an =
announcement on Blackboard is the equivalent of asking them to come to =
office hours in your building.  Posting on Facebook is more like showing =
up in the dorms for dinner. Posting here may reach students more =
quickly.

Use Online Tests to Create More Class Time

Online course management systems all include some testing function.  =
Many of us have felt the conflict between a desire for more timely =
assessment and the problem of "losing" class time.  In the last year or =
two the sophistication of online quizzes and assessments has =
dramatically changed in products like Blackboard, but there are also a =
quickly expanding array of free learning modules developed by your =
colleagues at merlot.org.) Moving one or more assessments outside of =
class time, again frees up the class time for something more =
interesting.

Again, the fringe benefits far exceed the original goal.  You can now =
give more quizzes and more varied assignments.  You can allow (or =
require) students to work together.  You can monitor their progress more =
easily.  You can provide opportunities at different hours; this levels =
the playing field for different types of learners and situations, but =
also reaches the traditional students who want to study late at night. =
Most importantly, however, you can disguise learning as exams and tie =
the assessment of learning to measurable and increased learning.

As a music teacher, I used to give periodic "drop the needle" exams, =
where the teacher drops the needle onto the record and asks students to =
identify the style, period, composer, performer etc. These were easy to =
grade, but as class size grew so did the work, and they took up class =
time.   They certainly didn't enhance learning; they only measured the =
work students had already done.  Then I created simple multiple choice =
exams in Blackboard.  This freed up class time, but students needed a =
way to test the system before logging on to take the exam.  So I created =
practice exams for each week using the same questions, but with the same =
pool of audio examples.  My support person wondered if students would =
cheat by memorizing all 150 examples before taking the test.  I thought, =
"that isn't cheating, that's learning." Indeed, allowing students to =
"practice" (or "cheat") dramatically increased how much time they spent =
"studying" or practicing this activity and increased the scores on the =
exams by almost an entire grade. Even when I randomly moved exams back =
into the classroom, there was dramatically increased performance.

Quizzes before Classes: No More Unprepared Students

We've all arrived in class only to find that most students have not done =
the reading and are hiding behind their desks.  One way to ensure this =
never happens again is to create an online mini quiz for every reading; =
each quiz is due an hour before the relevant class.  Create four =
multiple-choice questions and email a reminder and a deadline to all =
students.

An earlier version of this concept is Just in Time Teaching or "JiTT." =
(Novak, Patterson, Gavrin and Christian, 1999)  Students prepare a =
problem set or an assignment in advance of class and submit it before =
class; you use class time only to work on the problem areas.  New =
technology makes this easier and even more effective.  Now, not only do =
you know that every student did at least some of the reading, you can =
print out the quiz results an hour before class and focus on the issue =
they found most confusing or most compelling.

Pre-class problem-sets don't have to be SAT reading-comprehension-type =
questions.  I often ask students to discover a writer's bias, the hidden =
assumptions or to relate a story from their own life that reinforces the =
point the author is making.  It does not even have to be a quiz.  You =
could require your students simply to make a relevant online posting or =
submit a question they have. There have been online discussion groups =
for over a decade now and even in a large class, students can be divided =
into smaller discussion groups.  (Again, if you use Facebook, you can =
reach students where they already live.) While there is disagreement =
about whether online discussion can substitute for face-to-face =
discussion, it is clear that requiring students to make a few postings =
or demonstrate some competence with the material before class can only =
lead to better in-class discussions.

The Inverted Classroom

Most of us learned in the traditional model: come to class unprepared, =
listen passively to the first contact with the material, then go away to =
"learn" the material and then return for the exam.  In an "inverted =
classroom," (Platt and Lage, 2000) the first contact and exams happen =
outside of the classroom, but students come to class prepared to engage =
with other learners and the professor.  Project-based learning and the =
studio model of teaching in the arts are also expressions of the =
importance of engaging with students in the flesh. Technology makes it =
even easier to invert your classroom so that your classroom becomes the =
center of learning rather than only a passive point of first contact =
with the material.

The traditional model was once the most efficient one.  Long before the =
rise of cheap textbooks and the internet (in ancient Greece, for =
example) a lecture was the cheapest and most efficient mode of =
communicating new knowledge to a large group of students.  Larger =
nineteenth and twentieth-century concert halls and most of our lecture =
halls were designed using the latest acoustic technology to aid this =
delivery of content.  New technology allows for more varied modes of =
communication.

Lectures of Wonder

In the nineteenth century, long before radio, movies, television or =
paperbacks, going out to even a poor public lecture or concert was a =
rare and stimulating experience, but we can hardly expect our students =
to be this enthusiastic.   Our students understand the difference =
between passive and active multimedia experiences, and they are used to =
walking out of bad movies, concerts or lectures.  So if you want to =
reach students through lectures, they need to be lectures of wonder; =
they have to be even better than they used to be to be effective at all.

When you could only hear Beethoven live and in concert, you would =
tolerate lots of wrong notes.  Higher standards in recorded music have =
increased not only the standards of playing on those recordings, but =
also in our concert halls.  It's the same with lectures. They better be =
good. Save your best stuff for the live experience, but be realistic =
about what is engaging and how often you can deliver it.

The most obvious way to open up class time for those best "aha" moments =
is to remove your recitation of content (the lecture) from the class =
room.  If your classes are only lectures and exams, you might as well be =
teaching online.  Coming to class has to "add value" and reducing the =
technology and increasing the human interaction is the best way to =
create something interactive that cannot be duplicated online.  Most of =
your lectures (all of the ones covering "content") can be turned into =
videos, but interactive discussion cannot.
A great lecture is a great performance; it is best at stimulating an =
interest and spreading enthusiasm for further study.  Like any =
performance, you need wow factor, pacing (including change of pacing and =
plot twists) and you need a great ending. If your lecture includes a =
great "aha" moment, live experiments or demonstration, or you keep =
students on the edge of their seats, then lecture and make them even =
better.  (Bligh, 2000)  You can, however, probably improve that lecture =
(and that "aha" moment), by removing that survey of the bones in the =
foot or poetic structure.  If your students need background content to =
understand your great moment or to engage in discussion, then =
communicate that in some other way.  The lecture then can focus on =
something dramatic and memorable. Current research (Crouch and Mazur, =
2001) demonstrates that students retain relatively little content from =
most lectures, but they do take away a lot about your attitude toward =
learning and your subject.

What They'll See When You're Naked

Your style of teaching conveys volumes about your values, your =
discipline and what you want students to learn.  When you lecture about =
facts, the implication is that they should be memorizing facts.  If you =
tell students that they need to question authority, but you lecture from =
behind the podium, it is harder for them to question you and they =
probably don't take you seriously.  If you want students to think or =
consider multiple points of view, you need to create a situation in the =
classroom where they can do this.

While a good lecture is still a great way to present an introduction to =
many subjects, there are now better ways to allow more people to see =
them (see below).  While the technology is relatively easy and =
available, the much more dramatic change is what happens in the =
classroom.  Many new pedagogies (JiTT, Inverted Classroom, or =
Project-Based Learning) rely on a professor who is an improviser in the =
classroom.  This won't appeal to everyone and it is a huge change, but =
fear is not a good reason to avoid trying.  We all entered this =
profession because we are passionate about our subject.  All of us can =
talk passionately for 50 minutes (or longer) on a variety of subjects, =
and for most of us, reducing the lecture notes and trying only to =
communicate passionately a few key ideas results in more excited =
students who are inspired to learn more.

"Teaching naked," means moving some of the content, removing some of the =
personal safety net and simply trying to connect with our students.   =
Delivering first contact with the material is very safe; you know what =
comes next, and it is the students who are naked and unprotected.   When =
you provide another means and incentive for learning the material in =
advance, you give up some control, and that can feel like teaching =
naked, but it can improve students learning.

References

Bligh, D. A. (2000) What's the Use of Lectures? 6th rev. edn. Hoboken: =
Jossey-Bass.

Bowen, J. A. (2005) "Jazz Bandstand" and "JazzByEar" video games =
(designed with Britt Carr at Miami University) available at =
http://www.josebowen.com

Crouch, C., and Mazur, E.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and =
results.  American Journal of Physics, 69/9, pp 970-977.

Gee, J. P. (2003) What Video Games Have to Teach US about Learning and =
Literacy.  New York: Palgrave/ Macmillan.

Novak, G., Patterson, E., Gavrin, A., and Christian, W. (1999).  =
Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. =
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Platt, G., and Lage, M. (2000).  The Internet and the Inverted =
Classroom.  Journal of Economic Education, Winter 2000, (31/1)   =
(Electronic version: http://www.sba.muohio.edu/plattgj/eco201).



----------

If we are on another line or away from the phone, please leave your =
number, best time to return your call and/or your e-mail address.
=20
After hours and weekend phone appointments are available upon request.

Sincerely,

J. Michael Nolan, Director
=20
Rainforest and Reef 501 (c)(3) non-profit

*************************************************************************=
**************
"Outstanding-Affordable Field Courses in Rainforest & Marine Ecology"

"Spanish/Cultural Immersion: Spain, Mexico, Central and South America"

Rainforest and Reef 501 (c)(3) non-profit
P.O. Box 141543
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49514-1543 USA
Local/International Phone: 001.616.604.0546
Toll Free U.S. and Canada: 1.877.255.3721
Skype/MS IM: travelwithrandr
AOL IM: buddythemacaw
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Note: Please send inquiries to both e-mail addresses
Web: http://rainforestandreef.org

Costa Rica:
Juan Pablo Bello
San Jose, Costa Rica
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 011.506.290.8883/011.506.822.8222=20

Europe:
Marion Stephan
Frankfurt, Germany
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 011.49.172.305.4738
*************************************************************************=
**************

Reply via email to