Interesting. I just read about bednets with permethrin included in the 
fabric being very effective in malaria prevention. Unlike nets that are 
simply soaked in insecticide, or DDT sprayed in homes, these nets last 
several years without needing recharging or replacement.

I realize that malaria is a much bigger health concern in Africa than 
persistent pesticides are, but have any measurements been made of DDT 
concentrations in the tissues of people who live in treated houses? I 
suspect this would be most important for women.

Jane

William Silvert wrote:
> Given the past discussions of DDT on this list, I thought the following item 
> from the NY Times might be interesting to many of you.
> 
> Bill Silvert
> 
> August 20, 2007
> Op-Ed Contributor
> A New Home for DDT
> By DONALD ROBERTS
> Bethesda, Md.
> 
> DDT, the miracle insecticide turned environmental bogeyman, is once again 
> playing an important role in public health. In the malaria-plagued regions 
> of Africa, where mosquitoes are becoming resistant to other chemicals, DDT 
> is now being used as an indoor repellent. Research that I and my colleagues 
> recently conducted shows that DDT is the most effective pesticide for 
> spraying on walls, because it can keep mosquitoes from even entering the 
> room.
> 
> The news may seem surprising, as some mosquitoes worldwide are already 
> resistant to DDT. But we've learned that even mosquitoes that have developed 
> an immunity to being directly poisoned by DDT are still repelled by it.
> 
> Malaria accounts for nearly 90 percent of all deaths from vector-borne 
> disease globally. And it is surging in Africa, surpassing AIDS as the 
> biggest killer of African children under age 5.
>>From the 1940s onward, DDT was used to kill agricultural pests and 
> disease-carrying insects because it was cheap and lasted longer than other 
> insecticides. DDT helped much of the developed world, including the United 
> States and Europe, eradicate malaria. Then in the 1970s, after the 
> publication of Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring," which raised concern over 
> DDT's effects on wildlife and people, the chemical was banned in many 
> countries. Birds, especially, were said to be vulnerable, and the chemical 
> was blamed for reduced populations of bald eagles, falcons and pelicans. 
> Scientific scrutiny has failed to find conclusive evidence that DDT causes 
> cancer or other health problems in humans.
> 
> Today, indoor DDT spraying to control malaria in Africa is supported by the 
> World Health Organization; the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and 
> Malaria; and the United States Agency for International Development.
> 
> The remaining concern has been that the greater use of DDT in Africa would 
> only lead mosquitoes to develop resistance to it. Decades ago, such 
> resistance developed wherever DDT crop spraying was common. After the DDT 
> bans went into effect in the United States and elsewhere, it continued to be 
> used extensively for agriculture in Africa, and this exerted a powerful 
> pressure on mosquitoes there to develop resistance. Although DDT is now 
> prohibited for crop spraying in Africa, a few mosquito species there are 
> still resistant to it. But DDT has other mechanisms of acting against 
> mosquitoes beyond killing them. It also functions as a "spatial repellent," 
> keeping mosquitoes from entering areas where it has been sprayed, and as a 
> "contact irritant," making insects that come in contact with it so irritated 
> they leave.
> 
> In our studies, in which we sprayed DDT on the walls of huts in Thailand, 
> three out of every five test mosquitoes sensed the presence of DDT molecules 
> and would not enter the huts. Many of those that did enter and made contact 
> with DDT became irritated and quickly flew out.
> 
> The mosquitoes we used were the kind that carry dengue and yellow fever, not 
> malaria. But there is ample evidence that malaria-carrying mosquitoes 
> respond similarly to DDT. Several malaria-carrying species are even more 
> sensitive to DDT's repellent effects.
> 
> When we sprayed the huts with either dieldrin or alphacypermethrin, in 
> contrast, all the test mosquitoes entered. Alphacypermethrin acted as a 
> contact irritant, and it killed others that lingered on a treated surface. 
> Dieldrin worked only as a poison - a powerful one, killing 92 percent of 
> mosquitoes that made contact with it, far more than alphacypermethrin or 
> DDT.
> 
> But dieldrin's strong toxicity means that mosquitoes quickly develop 
> resistance to it. Its use against malaria was short-lived, ending in the 
> 1950s, because it so quickly became powerless.
> Alphacypermethrin and others like it in the family of so-called pyrethroid 
> insecticides are viewed as environmentally friendly, so they are used 
> heavily in agriculture, in Africa and elsewhere. They are also used for 
> treating bed nets and in indoor spraying programs to control malaria. But 
> these multiple uses, combined with fact that the insecticide must make 
> contact with the insect in order to work, have made pyrethroid resistance a 
> large and growing problem for pest control programs in Africa.
> 
> DDT's spatial repellency, by keeping mosquitoes from making physical 
> contact, reduces the likelihood that the insects will develop resistance. 
> Even those mosquitoes already resistant to poisoning by DDT are repelled by 
> it.
> 
> It would be a mistake to think we could rely on DDT alone to fight 
> mosquitoes in Africa. Fortunately, research aimed at developing new and 
> better insecticides continues - thanks especially to the work of the 
> international Innovative Vector Control Consortium. Until a suitable 
> alternative is found, however, DDT remains the cheapest and most effective 
> long-term malaria fighter we have.
> Donald Roberts is an emeritus professor of tropical medicine at the 
> Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and a board member of 
> the nonprofit health advocacy group Africa Fighting Malaria.
> 
> Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company 
> 

-- 
-------------
Jane Shevtsov
Ecology Ph.D. student, University of Georgia
co-founder, <http://www.worldbeyondborders.org>World Beyond Borders
Check out my blog, <http://perceivingwholes.blogspot.com>Perceiving Wholes

"In the long run, education intended to produce a molecular geneticist, 
a systems ecologist, or an immunologist is inferior, both for the 
individual and for society, than that intended to produce a broadly 
educated person who has also written a dissertation." --John Janovy, 
Jr., "On Becoming a Biologist"

Reply via email to