This statement in the article astounded me:
'“While it is important to analyze the climate change consequences of 
differing energy strategies, we must all remember where we are today, 
how world demand for liquid fuels is growing, and what the realistic 
alternatives are to meet those growing demands,” said Bob Dineen, the 
group’s director, in a statement following the Science reports’ release.'

The REAL point is that we have to reduce demand.  Obviously reducing 
demand or moving towards a steady state is not attractive because there 
is no money in it, making it bad for business (at least current 
businesses).  For the same reason, Reduce and Reuse get very little 
media coverage--it's all about Recycle.

Aren't cars and trucks the main consumers of liquid fuels?

CL

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cara Lin Bridgman

P.O. Box 013          Phone: 886-4-2632-5484
Longjing Sinjhuang
Taichung County 434
Taiwan                http://megaview.com.tw/~caralin/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

William Silvert wrote:
 > This story appeared in today's NY Times, and the articles referred to 
appear in the current issue of Science.
 >
 > February 8, 2008
 >
 > Studies Deem Biofuels a Greenhouse Threat
 >
 > By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
 >
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/08/science/earth/08wbiofuels.html?sq=greenhouse&st=nyt&scp=3&pagewanted=all>

Reply via email to