Bruce,

Thanks for sharing that! It is thought provoking - and I have just skimmed 
through your excerpts - so I will refrain from commenting just yet. Instead, 
let me share another article - interview actually - about what's wrong with the 
American University System, which comes from a somewhat different angle:

http://is.gd/dTIL2

I'll be curious to hear what Ecologgers think of both of these.

Madhu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Madhusudan Katti
Assistant Professor of Vertebrate Biology
Department of Biology, M/S SB73
California State University, Fresno
Fresno, CA 93740-8034

Email:  [email protected]
Tel:            559.278.1460
Fax:            559.278.3963
Web:    http://www.reconciliationecology.org/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Bruce Robertson wrote:

> All,
> 
> I"m a postdoc searching for a faculty position in ecology. I just read the 
> article below, which recently appeared in the Chronicle of Higher Education. 
> It paints a grim picture of academia, now and for the foreseeable future. I'm 
> highly productive, love research and teaching and feel that academia is where 
> I belong. Yet, I find myself very disheartened by many aspects of the current 
> academic environment and this article seems to bear some of my perspectives 
> out. I would really appreciate if any faculty would comment on this article 
> as it relates to their experience....though, if this article is correct, they 
> will be far too busy to read this. :)
> 
> Cheers, and article below--
> 
> Bruce Robertson
> Postdoctoral Fellow
> Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center
> Current mailing address:
> 3310 West Main Street #101
> Kalamazoo, MI 49006
> 206-718-9172
> [email protected]
> Homepage: www.msu.edu/~roberba1/Index.html/
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________
> The *Chronicle of Higher Education* includes an article: "The Ivory
> Sweatshop: Academe Is No Longer a Convivial Refuge" by Sarah Kiewel.
> 
> Here are some excerpts:
> 
> [begin excerpts]
> 
> With standards for tenure at major research universities rising year by
> year, professors say academe has become such a pressure-cooker
> environment that faculty jobs barely resemble those of a generation ago.
> 
> Gone are the days when academe was considered a convivial refuge from
> the corporate world, a place where scholars had ample time to debate
> ideas--often during lunch or over drinks after class.
> 
> Professors, particularly those at research universities, are simply
> working much more and much harder these days.
> 
> They are competing for scarcer grant money, turning out more articles
> and books, coping with the speedup in communications afforded by better
> technology, and traveling the globe to establish the kind of
> international reputation that's now necessary to thrive.
> 
> "What I'm seeing now is junior faculty really just putting their noses
> to the grindstone," says Frank Donoghue, an associate professor of
> English at Ohio State University, who earned his Ph.D. in 1986.
> 
> "It's had the effect of transforming the culture of the academy into one
> that is much more businesslike."
> 
> "Assistant professors are producing article after article and research
> study after research study," says David D. Perlmutter, who directs the
> School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Iowa.
> 
> "Then they're looking at the promotion-and-tenure committee and they're
> going, Wow, I've actually published more in the last six years than all
> of them combined."
> 
> <snip>
> 
> John B. Conway, chairman of mathematics at George Washington University,
> certainly remembers a time when getting through graduate school and
> finding a faculty job was much simpler.
> 
> He earned his Ph.D. in 1965 after just four years and never completed a
> postdoctoral fellowship--a virtual requirement these days for scholars
> who want to work at a research university like his.
> 
> Mr. Conway secured his first academic job, at Indiana University,
> without even applying for a position. His adviser put out some calls to
> department chairmen, and the deal was done.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Robert G. Bergman, who holds a distinguished professorship in chemistry
> at the University of California at Berkeley, agrees that times have changed.
> 
> "This job has gotten a thousand percent harder than when I started out,"
> says Mr. Bergman, who began teaching in 1967.
> 
> It takes a lot more time now, he says, for scholars to keep current with
> advances in their discipline.
> 
> "When I was starting out, one of the premier journals in my field, the
> Journal of the American Chemical Society, came out once a month, and it
> was relatively thin," he says.
> 
> "Now it comes out once a week, and it's much thicker."
> 
> Because of declining state and federal funds, professors also spend more
> time trying to raise money for their own research.
> 
> In fact, Mr. Bergman recalls a time during the late 1960s when someone
> from a federal agency called a chemistry professor at the California
> Institute of Technology, where he was teaching, and said, "Please submit
> a grant. We want to give you money."
> 
> Now, if something like that happened, everyone would think it was a joke.
> 
> "We have people submitting a large number of proposals just so one or
> two will hit," says Mr. Bergman.
> 
> "That means a massive amount more work."
> 
> Scholars also routinely spend much more time away from their campuses
> now than they ever did in the past, he says.
> 
> They travel to present their work at far-flung seminars where they might
> meet luminaries who could give their work a nod come tenure time.
> 
> "There used to be much more confidence that just in publishing stuff,
> your work would be known."
> 
> A study of work-life issues conducted by Harvard University's Graduate
> School of Education found that Generation X professors value efficiency
> over face time.
> 
> The study, which consisted of conversations with about a dozen research-
> university professors born between 1964 and 1980, found that younger
> professors didn't want to become workaholics.
> 
> But none of the young scholars who spoke with The Chronicle about
> faculty workload seemed to believe that dialing down was an option.
> 
> Luis Ponjuan, an assistant professor at the University of Florida,
> refers to himself as an "intellectual entrepreneur," even though he
> studies higher-education administration, not business.
> 
> He doesn't think of his job as affording him time to ponder big ideas
> with interesting colleagues and students.
> 
> "I identify pockets of opportunity that other people will buy into,
> support, and fund --to lessen the state's responsibility," he says of his
> research.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> The more calculated approach is the result of heightened competition, he
> says.
> 
> "There's a finite number of faculty positions, a finite number of
> grants, and a finite number of journals."
> 
> Scholars like Mr. Ponjuan who have been on the job for only a few years
> have already noticed an upward creep in standards since they were hired.
> 
> "There's been a major escalation in terms of what CV's look like for
> people being considered for a position," says Greta R. Krippner. By the
> time she finished her doctorate in sociology,
> 
> in 2003, she had completed four publications, none of them in the
> field's two flagship journals: the American Journal of Sociology and the
> American Sociological Review.
> 
> Her work was good enough, though, to get her a starting job at the
> University of California at Los Angeles.
> 
> Since then she has moved to the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor,
> where she is up for tenure next year.
> 
> "Now it's kind of normal that you see a graduate student with a paper in
> one of those top journals," she says.
> 
> "Just last year, we looked at someone who already had a book out, plus a
> handful of articles."
> 
> In fact, that job candidate--who hadn't even finished his Ph.D.--had
> already completed what at Michigan would now be a very respectable
> tenure file, says Ms. Krippner.
> 
> Indeed, the tight job market has given top universities the luxury of
> choosing candidates who have already demonstrated an ability to attract
> grants and churn out papers.
> 
> Particularly in the sciences, universities invest so much in start-up
> packages for young scholars that no department any longer wants to take
> a chance on an untested hire.
> 
> "Departments can afford to hire people who already have what they need
> to do to pass at least their third-year review," says Diana B. Carlin, a
> professor of communication studies at the University of Kansas who was
> dean of the graduate school until 2007.
> 
> That third-year review has also become a much more formal evaluation
> process than it was 10 to 20 years ago.
> 
> Jennifer Ng, who just earned tenure in the School of Education at
> Kansas, says one of her older colleagues told her that his own third-
> year review had consisted of the department chairman's pulling him aside
> and saying, "You're looking good."
> 
> Ms. Ng, on the other hand, had to document her work in a package that
> resembled a miniature tenure file.
> 
> Young professors are reluctant to complain publicly about how much
> harder they may be working than their senior colleagues did when they
> were starting out.
> 
> But professors who are in midcareer hear the comments.
> 
> "My younger colleagues feel they don't have the same opportunity as
> previous generations to sit and really think and let ideas germinate,"
> says Gregory M. Colon Semenza, an associate professor of English at the
> University of Connecticut.
> 
> "What used to be a truly enjoyable intellectual process has become a
> very professionalized model of efficiency."
> 
> Meanwhile, experienced scholars say their own workload has increased as well.
> 
> The pace doesn't necessarily slow down anymore once a scholar gains tenure.
> 
> Young professors are typically protected from committee assignments and
> departmental duties while they are on the tenure track, but then those
> burdens get dumped on them, too.
> 
> "People are freaked out about the amount of work they have--there's just
> no time," says William A. Pannapacker, an associate professor of English
> at Hope College.
> 
> "Once you're tenured, suddenly you're given way more administrative
> responsibility really fast, and you have no training for it, and you
> have no idea what you're doing."
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Nora Berrah, a distinguished professor of physics at Western Michigan
> University, has worked in academe since 1987. She still devotes most of
> her waking hours to her research, and spends about half of her time
> traveling to national laboratories, where she collaborates on projects.
> Back in her office at Western Michigan, she usually keeps the door closed.
> 
> "Sometimes I avoid my colleagues in the hallway," she says, "because I'm
> afraid it's going to take awhile to say, 'Hello, how are you doing?'"
> 
> Campus social life does seem to be a casualty of the work speedup in
> higher education.
> 
> A couple of decades ago, it wasn't unusual for faculty members to have
> lunch together during the workweek and attend parties in one another's
> homes on the weekends.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Mr. Menand, who is now an English professor at Harvard University, has
> been back to Princeton several times in the last few years, and notes
> that things have changed. For one, "half the faculty live in New York."
> And even in a college town like Cambridge, he says, the culture has changed.
> 
> "You make a lunch date two weeks in advance, but you just don't all
> gather at noon and head off."
> 
> Many research universities have cut teaching loads to help their faculty
> members make time for increased demands in research and publishing.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Mr. Bergman says the breakdown of social relationships among professors
> is more important than people might think.
> 
> "You're less willing to get into conflict with people if they are part
> of your social circle as well as your professional circle."
> 
> And Mr. Menand says faculty work looks a lot less attractive to
> prospective academics than it used to.
> 
> "I think the demands have come to be experienced as all-consuming,
> 24/7," he says.
> 
> "That's bad because of the quality of life and because it discourages
> other people from getting into academe."
> 
> He adds: "You don't want smart college students taking one look at what
> we have to do to keep our jobs and saying,  That's not how I want to
> spend my life."
> 
> [end excerpts]
> 
> The article is online at:
> <http://bit.ly/8XKENPope>
> 
> Ken Pope
> 
> THE THERAPIST AS A PERSON:
> <http://kspope.com/therapistas/index.php>
> 
> "Ask yourself what makes you come alive, and go do that, because what
> the world needs is people who have come alive."
> -- Howard Thurman (1900-1981)

Reply via email to