Robert,
I'd love to hear how nearly 200 years of study of what we call the
"greenhouse" effect constitutes "weak hypothethicals" and "political
hackery." Care to share your insight?
Dave
On 12/5/2011 1:00 PM, Robert Hamilton wrote:
Science works to persuade when it provides real data, not weak
hypotheticals. Consider the issue of ozone vs CO2. Lots of real data on
ozone, nothing but political hackery on CO2, so we get some action on
ozone and nothing but conflict on CO2. However, we are only as strong as
our weakest link, so the CO2 argument defines us.
Robert Hamilton, PhD
Professor of Biology
Alice Lloyd College
Pippa Passes, KY 41844
--
------------------------------------------------------
David M. Lawrence | Home: (804) 559-9786
7471 Brook Way Court | Fax: (804) 559-9787
Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | Email: [email protected]
USA | http: http://fuzzo.com
------------------------------------------------------
"All drains lead to the ocean." -- Gill, Finding Nemo
"We have met the enemy and he is us." -- Pogo
"No trespassing
4/17 of a haiku" -- Richard Brautigan
