If scientists are not receptive to or rigorously examining opposing viewpoints, then they failing as their role as scientists. However, that is not to say they there are not many viewpoints out there (especially in terms of climate change) that are not backed by any actual science data.
I think this whole discussion should serve as a reminder about the kind of science education that is happening in our country at the k-12 level and the transformation that is needed. In order for society to make these changes that we are asking them, they have to be scientifically literate. If we are just teaching content and science facts in school, then we will not have a society with the skills to understand modeling, reason through arguments, ask probing questions, and argue evidence based on data not personal bias. Not everyone is going to grow up to be a scientist, but if we want to be able to have these discussions with *everyone*, we have to teach our students to be able to think. examine evidence. and question. now. My two cents. Susan Pienta
