I have noticed (albeit a small sample size) recently that several on-line
journals have rigid, time consuming and picky processes for paper
submission. To submit a paper, one is required to format for publication in
an idiosyncratic style, one that is not necessarily shared by other
journals. This would be fine after acceptance but it is a tremendous waste
of time beforehand. Second the submitting formats are rigid. If one can't
give the desired responses one can't move forward. One admission process
required taxon identification but didn't include the avian order I was
concerned with. Another placed Hawaii in Polynesia, not the US. There may
be cogent arguments for this but a journal submission should not be an
exercise in geopolitical tiddlywinks.  Several require email addresses for
all authors, not so subtly discriminating against folks in developing
countries that might not have easy or stable access to the Internet. Others
require one to sign off concerning a wide range of compliance and conflict
of interest concerns that may or may not apply. Some submission processes
seem to work only with specific browsers but the editors either don't know
this or don't see it necessary to tell one that they are still locked into
Windows 7. Finally some allow you to save and return but others don't. The
last is especially sadistic.

How much of this information is truly necessary when deciding whether to
send a paper out for review, assuming sending out for reviewing really
happens?

An ethical approach for electronic journal submission would be to allow
submissions in some simplified format: title, abstract, introduction,
methods, results, discussion, conclusion, acknowledgments, literature
cited. If the paper is accepted, bring on the compliance and conflict of
interest assurances, literature (or reference) cited formats,  unit
abbreviations, use of parentheses and so on. If all these data are truly
necessary up front, perhaps a measure of an on-line journal's quality might
be whether it actually knows how to handle things on-line. If not, in ten
years, one's paper may well vanish into the cloud along with the journal.

I would welcome replies from journal editors if they feel I am being unfair.

-- 
David Duffy
戴大偉 (Dài Dàwěi)
Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit
Botany
University of Hawaii
3190 Maile Way
Honolulu Hawaii 96822 USA
1-808-956-8218

Reply via email to