Hi Martin Martin Laabs wrote:
> my port based on the one of Evgeniy Dushitov at the very beginning. > However - after some weeks I discovered that it was very hard to support > more CPUs out of the AT91SAM9 family with that code-base. > So I started from beginning, reusing only some code snipplet from > Evgeniy. I made the decision to split the port into three packages. [ snip ] It sounds like your input will be valuable. Please do track the discussion in bug 1000819 and comment where appropriate. To be clear, I still think it makes sense that we focus on Evgeniy's contribution and modify it where necessary during the review. John Dallaway eCos maintainer http://www.dallaway.org.uk/john
