> Martin Laabs wrote: > >> my port based on the one of Evgeniy Dushitov at the very beginning. >> However - after some weeks I discovered that it was very hard to support >> more CPUs out of the AT91SAM9 family with that code-base. >> So I started from beginning, reusing only some code snipplet from >> Evgeniy. I made the decision to split the port into three packages. > > [ snip ] > > It sounds like your input will be valuable. Please do track the > discussion in bug 1000819 and comment where appropriate. To be clear, I > still think it makes sense that we focus on Evgeniy's contribution and > modify it where necessary during the review. > > John Dallaway > eCos maintainer > http://www.dallaway.org.uk/john >
I hope that a serious look at what Martin has to offer will be considered before deciding on which contribution is used as a base. IMHO, simply because an existing contribution is currently being used in the community, that should not preclude a new contribution for replacing it, if it is in fact a 'better' contribution. I haven't seen or worked with either code base, so I have no vested interest either way. -- Mike
