On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Ilija Kocho wrote: > On 27.03.2011 14:45, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > > > > Hi Ilija, > > > > I get it (about your attempting to build the in-lines using CDL), but, I > > would keep things simpler, i.e. just would add two absent entries for > > TTY4, TTY5, TTYx in tty.c. Those are conditional definitions depend on > > > Adding two additional TTYs is an alternative indeed, it is simple and > straightforward to implement. > > My idea was to make system auto extensible and configurable. I have > fixed number of TTYs to 6, but as you suggest in your research below it > could be defined as a variable. HAL could provide an override too. Also > maintenance may be simpler since we avoid duplicated code?!
Indeed. But, now I think that I gave bad suggest about extension via environment variable (How to document this "feature"? Who will know about? It looks like a trick) Ilija, so far, I take a timeout to think and test your substitutions and I will try to find compromise solution without the tricks and complex Tcl/CDL expressions. Sergei
