On 27.03.2011 19:11, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Ilija Kocho wrote: > >> On 27.03.2011 14:45, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: >>> Hi Ilija, >>> >>> I get it (about your attempting to build the in-lines using CDL), but, I >>> would keep things simpler, i.e. just would add two absent entries for >>> TTY4, TTY5, TTYx in tty.c. Those are conditional definitions depend on >>> >> Adding two additional TTYs is an alternative indeed, it is simple and >> straightforward to implement. >> >> My idea was to make system auto extensible and configurable. I have >> fixed number of TTYs to 6, but as you suggest in your research below it >> could be defined as a variable. HAL could provide an override too. Also >> maintenance may be simpler since we avoid duplicated code?! > Indeed. But, now I think that I gave bad suggest about extension via > environment variable (How to document this "feature"? Who will know > about? It looks like a trick) Ilija, so far, I take a timeout to think > and test your substitutions and I will try to find compromise solution > without the tricks and complex Tcl/CDL expressions. > Thanks, In meantime I have a code that compiles and works. I will post to Bugzilla so we can continue there.
Ilija
