On 2008-10-28, Chris Zimman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Here's an interesting web page: https://vpnout.com/ >> >> Not that _I'd_ oficially condone using something like that to >> get around the roadblocks to getting work done that have been >> set up by your local Mordac. > > Yeah, I know how to get around it, but I would rather have > something that worked with it. CVS is just outdated in the > networking department as well. Both GIT and SVN work fine over > HTTP/HTTPS.
True. It's a bit OT, but there's one thing I've been wondering about should eCos switch over to SVN. Since we use SVN locally for our eCos source tree, is there any way to simultaneusly use SVN with the "main" repository and with a local repository? Right now we can configure svn to ignore the cvs stuff and cvs to ignore the svn stuff. Then we can have a source tree that's both a working copy of our local SVN repository and a working copy of the main CVS repository. Obviously the diffs with respect to the two repository aren't always the same, but they're still useful. Does either GIT or SVN provide a way to work with two repositories? -- Grant -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
