Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2008-10-28, Chris Zimman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Here's an interesting web page: https://vpnout.com/ >>> >>> Not that _I'd_ oficially condone using something like that to >>> get around the roadblocks to getting work done that have been >>> set up by your local Mordac. >>> >> Yeah, I know how to get around it, but I would rather have >> something that worked with it. CVS is just outdated in the >> networking department as well. Both GIT and SVN work fine over >> HTTP/HTTPS. >> > > True. > > It's a bit OT, but there's one thing I've been wondering about > should eCos switch over to SVN. Since we use SVN locally for > our eCos source tree, is there any way to simultaneusly use SVN > with the "main" repository and with a local repository? > > Right now we can configure svn to ignore the cvs stuff and cvs > to ignore the svn stuff. Then we can have a source tree that's > both a working copy of our local SVN repository and a working > copy of the main CVS repository. Obviously the diffs with > respect to the two repository aren't always the same, but > they're still useful. > > Does either GIT or SVN provide a way to work with two > repositories? > I'm not a VCS wizard (know just enough to basically run our SVN) so please regard following comment as both hint and question. Doesn't distributed repository provide a solution this problem? Can we consider that with VCS everyone effectively has an own repository that is/(can be) synchronized with "official" repository?
Regards Ilija -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
