Simon Kallweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > Chris Holgate discovered a little inconsistency in the interrupt > vector definitions, we have: > > #define CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_DMA0_CH1 > (11+CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL) > #define CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_DMA0_CH2 > (12+CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL) > ... > > and > > #define CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_DMA2_CH1 > (56+CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL) > #define CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_DMA2_CH2 > (57+CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL) > ... > > In the STM32 reference manual the first set is named only DMA, the > second set DMA2, which seems inconstant too. Can we agree to call them > DMA1/DMA2?
That seems like a sensible thing to do. This is partly down to ST's annoying habit of numbering devices from 1 rather that 0. I'll check in a fix for this when I apply your recent patches. -- Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No: 4422071 -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
