On 24.02.2012 20:37, Grant Edwards wrote: [snip]
> [I was hoping the 3.2->4.6 change might produce noticably smaller or > faster code. The size reduction is about 0.8%, and though I haven't > done any extensive benchmarking, I haven't noticed any speed > improvement yet.] I haven't compared against 3.2. Regarding speed, for Cortex-M3 target the Coremark test shows 12% speed up of 4.6.2 against 4.3.2. But Cortex-M runs Thumb2 instruction set, the picture may be different for ARM code. Ilija -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
