On 2012-02-24, Sergei Gavrikov <s...@scanex.ru> wrote:
> Grant, did you try *arm-eabi* toolchain for your target before? Of
> course, if this is possible. I mean stable arm-eabi (4.3.2) toolchain
> from eCosCentric? May be you missed that CFLAGS clean-up step on 4.3.2
> migration?
No I hadn't tried the older arm-eabi toolchain and wasn't aware of any
manual CFLGAGS changes that needed to be made. I assumed that the CDL
from CVS HEAD would use the right CFLAGS.
> Ah! So, you used old 'arm-elf' toolchain before.
Yes.
> As far I remember CFLAGS for all *arm-eabi* targets in eCos AnonCVS
> were fixed in those days (pre eCos 3.0 days). Well, there are a few
> *arm-elf* targets in eCos AnonCVS. As I could see *arm-elf* based
> are sa11x0, pid, aeb, and ebsa285.
I don't understand. If the FreeBSD code requires
-fno-strict-aliasing, shouldn't the CDL for the FreeBSD package take
care of that?
> Well, I believe that we will rid all warnings at the end :-) More
> warnings means that the newest compiler is more pedantic and IMHO, that
> is good for programmers, but not for their elder code :-)
Indeed. All of my code, including my HAL, compiles cleanly with
either compiler -- it's the standard code I just grabbed from CVS that
I was talking about.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I joined scientology
at at a garage sale!!
gmail.com
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
