"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This patch fixes a small issue with the SysTick reload value (this has
> to be period - 1) and fixed wrap-around in the hal_delay_us() function.

The -1 on the period is OK.

However, I don't see the point in the change to HAL_DELAY_US(). As far
as I can tell it has exactly the same effect, or am I missing
something?


-- 
Nick Garnett                                      eCos Kernel Architect
eCosCentric Limited    http://www.eCosCentric.com      The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK.     Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales:                        Reg No: 4422071

Reply via email to