Simon Kallweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nick Garnett schrieb: > > However, I don't see the point in the change to HAL_DELAY_US(). As far > > as I can tell it has exactly the same effect, or am I missing > > something? > > > > Do a series on paper, it's not the same. When the wrap around occures, > you will add to the us counter. The 100ms delay on a redboot reboot > never returned. With this fix, it actually takes 100ms :)
I'm still not convinced. However, there is no reason not to make the change so I've applied it. -- Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No: 4422071
