Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001116
--- Comment #43 from Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> 2011-01-31 17:39:04 GMT --- (In reply to comment #42) > (In reply to comment #34) > > > > I am kind of undecided. Somebody else's opinion is welcome. > > ^^^^^^^^ > > That would be fine. John, if you read, what > > is your opinion? > > Sergei, is this about whether to place var_data[] in peripheral memory or to > keep it in main memory? Is there something different about this array relative > to those you are definitely moving to peripheral memory? John, The ones moved to peripheral memory are: memp_memory[] and ram_heap[] i.e. arrays from which lwip allocates memory for pbufs, etc. It is what would typically peripheral (hardware) do. var_data[] on the other hand contains thread related data (not buffers). At the beginning I wanted to save as much as possible, but later as I had gained some insight I have reconsidered my view. Other difference is that var_data[] is used in sequential mode which is not very likely used on devices with low memory. Please refer to comment #36 and comment #37 for our further conversation with Sergei. Thanks for your consideration Ilija -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
