Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001142
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> 2011-02-14 08:35:57 GMT --- (In reply to comment #6) > The macro is intended to be completely generic, suitable to any variant. We > know that other Cortex-M variants include peripheral memory which could be > used via such a macro. Placing this definition in cortex.ld seems like the > right approach to me. I could envisage a similar definition being added to > *.ld for other architectures in the future. > > The *.ldi files were once generated by a memory layout tool and it seems best > to avoid adding arbitrary code to these files so the possibility of > re-introducing such a tool is preserved. > I do agree that the name "SECTION_user()" could lead to some confusion with > the existing SECTION_*() macros which have a different number of parameters. > I would be happy to use a macro name such as "USER_SECTION()" instead. John, then I "found" such a name too :-), and I like this name and now I would argee with your points about macro placement (cortexm.ld). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
