Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001142
--- Comment #9 from Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> 2011-02-14 12:34:01 GMT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > (In reply to comment #6) [snip] > > > I do agree that the name "SECTION_user()" could lead to some confusion > > > with the existing SECTION_*() macros which have a different number of > > > parameters. I would be happy to use a macro name such as > > > "USER_SECTION()" instead. > > > > John, then I "found" such a name too :-), and I like this name and now I > > would argee with your points about macro placement (cortexm.ld). > > Me too, do you need me to produce a new patch? So, we are happy with USER_SECTION(). What's about those SECTION_START, SECTION_END definitions in the Attachment 1116 ? Will be they ever used then? IMO, the names are too generic and seem like the "reserved" words ... If you need those defs, what is about USER_LABEL() instead? #define USER_LABEL(_label_) \ ... If we do not need those defs at all, I would be happy with (not tested) --- a/packages/hal/cortexm/arch/current/src/cortexm.ld +++ b/packages/hal/cortexm/arch/current/src/cortexm.ld @@ -268,5 +268,11 @@ OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf32-bigarm) #define SECTIONS_END . = ALIGN(4); _end = .; PROVIDE (end = .); +#define USER_SECTION(_name_, _region_, _vma_, _lma_) \ + . ## _name_ _vma_ : _lma_ \ + { __ ## _name_ ## _start = ABSOLUTE (.); \ + *(. ## _name_)* \ + __ ## _name_ ## _end = ABSOLUTE (.); } + #include <pkgconf/hal_cortexm.h> #include CYGHWR_MEMORY_LAYOUT_LDI Comments? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
