Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001186
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> 2011-04-06 16:42:30 BST --- (In reply to comment #3) > The M4 stuff looks OK to me. > > However, I am not sure that we need the M0 option. [snip] > Adding M0 to the list would raise entirely false expectations that this > processor type was supported. In fact, I would prefer to remove M1, since > these parts have the same problems. > > We would have to do quite a lot of work to support M0/1. Given that these > parts are targeted at very low resource systems, I doubt that there will > ever be much demand for eCos on these. Nick, thank you for your expert look and explanation. So then, should I reject the M0 (and M1?) mentions from the cortexm config file? Ilija, do you have M0-claim for your present ports? If you have not, I'll fix the patch too. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
