Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001186
--- Comment #6 from Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> 2011-04-06 17:07:45 BST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Nick, thank you for your expert look and explanation. So then, should I > > reject the M0 (and M1?) mentions from the cortexm config file? > > My opinion is that we should not add M0, and I think M1 should be removed > until > we have real support for that variant. I added M1 to the list early on in > development, before I fully understood the actual differences between the v6-M > and v7-M architectures. Thank you for your review Nick. I had the same concerns regarding M0 and I added it mainly because of presence of M1. I agree with you to omit M0 and M1. Should anybody decide to port eCos to M0/M1 the easiest part of the job is to put an entry in the legal values. Note: Also we have to change the description. I propose to keep only offered values (M3 M4) there too. If you agree and this is all I could prepare a new patch for review. Ilija. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
