Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #30 from Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> 2011-05-19 13:48:04 BST --- (In reply to comment #29) [snip] > would be my humble opinion. The problem I see with supporting the SAM3 from > the > same IO package is that the peripheral bus structure usually implemented on > cortex devices is not the same as the earlier models. Perhaps the IO package > should be divided by peripheral bus structure AHB,AMBA etc. Okay that's enough > from me. For example of grafting legacy ARM peripherals to Cortex-M3 you can look at LPC-17xx port Bug 1001114 being combined with LPC-2xxx peripherals Bug 1001115 . However if larger re-organization of AT91 port is considered, I would propose moving AT91 peripherals out of ARM devs subdirectories (except for peripherals based on ARM IP, if any). Something like this: packages-+ +-devs+ +-serial+ +-AT91-+ +-current-+... Also following scheme could be considered (although radical) if same devices are shared among all AT91 platforms: packages-+ +-devs-+ +-Atmel(AT91)-+ +-serial-+... +-ethernet-+... +-spi-+... Ilija -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
