Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819
--- Comment #32 from Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> 2011-05-19 14:31:37 BST --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > > However if larger re-organization of AT91 port is considered, I > > would propose moving AT91 peripherals out of ARM devs subdirectories > > (except for peripherals based on ARM IP, if any). Something like > > this: > > > > packages-+ > > +-devs+ > > +-serial+ > > +-AT91-+ > > +-current-+... > > That's what makes the most sense to me, and it's the way all the other > processor families are supported -- isn't it? I couldn't tell. In general devs looks pretty much scattered to me. For example there are many directories related to Freescale's controllers, I can imagine some of them contain same devices. On the other hand are ARM directories that contain devices that are not related to ARM (architecture or company) merely to chips with ARM cores. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
