Brian,
You seem very knowledgable about this. What would moving up to one of
the new 733-750 MHz machines do. Would that provide any relief or would
it be negligible? I am assuming of course that such a machine is not
being used now. Let's just assume a 400 Mhz CPU.
brian lehrhoff wrote:
> Mentor and Director are the same - small files flow, large files
> choke. The only way to achieve throughput on the PC platform is to
> feed a steady stream of small files. I can't tell you the optimum
> size for Director, but Mentor seems to top out at 700-800K per flat
> file. The Unix flavor of Mentor does not have this "problem".
>
> Mercator would be a good choice for your solution, but keep in mind
> that Mercator will read and validate your entire input file before
> writing. Make sure your production machine has plenty of memory
> (fastest) or disk (slower) for the work files. Same caveat prevails -
> smaller input files run faster.
>
> Outsourcing? Glad to talk to you about it. Also glad to give you a
> straight answer to your question :)
>
> Anthony Beecher wrote:
>
--
Glenn Thompson
Programmer/Analyst
American Trouser, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
