William,

Even more important than the UBL schema themselves is their reliance on
open standards and their underlying standards based library of ISO
15000-5 Business Information Entities.  Also supporting the UBL BIEs and
ready for prime time consumption is the UN/CEFACT library of context
neutral core components and soon to be released expanded library of
business information entities. UBL's XML Schema Naming and Design Rules
fully support ISO 15000-5/11179.  The main difference between the UBL
and UN/CEFACT approaches and CICA is that whereas on the one hand CICA
is proprietary, UBL and UN/CEFACT are using open standards to develop
their process models, libraries, and XML schema.  Whereas CICA requires
the use of the X12 Black Box, UBL and UN/CEFACT schemas can be created
by anyone using any tool. Whereas CICA is targeting North America, UBL
and UN/CEFACT are targeting the rest of the world and are already
experiencing adoption by public and private sector interests.

Mark
Mark R. Crawford
Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC 
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components

 
LMI Government Consulting
2000 Corporate Ridge
McLean, VA 22102-7805
703.917.7177 Phone
703.655.4810 Wireless
The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater. 

www.lmi.org 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 7:21 PM
> To: EDI-L Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [EDI-L] X12 CICA: Is it the future? Does anyone 
> really "mod el"?
> 
> 
> Thanks.  I'm not gonna live forever.  So I guess you're 
> saying that if a trading partner and I are willing to play 
> around with XML now, that I have nowhere to go for a usable 
> PO other than UBL.  There's the notion of "time to market," 
> pal.  Is the XML e-business standards ship done sailed as far 
> as X12 is concerned?
> 
> I learned EDI by reading a couple PIDX and VICS books and 
> looking at their examples.  I vaguely knew enough about the 
> structure of X12 long before I ever had to tackle X12.5 and 
> X12.6 which described the syntax using  BNF.  So I guess I 
> don't want to have to read X12.7 and "imagine"
> what a PO would look like.  I want an XML schema or example 
> now.  Where are some examples - even if incomplete - of XML 
> messages based on CICA?
> 
> Thanks in Advance.
> 
> William J. Kammerer
> Novannet, LLC.
> Columbus, OH 43221-3859 . USA
> +1 (614) 487-0320
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Rawlins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "EDI-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, 20 January, 2005 06:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [EDI-L] X12 CICA: Is it the future? Does anyone 
> really "mod el"?
> 
> 
> 
> At 05:42 PM 1/20/2005 -0500, William J. Kammerer wrote:
> 
> >But are the "more definitive descriptions of CICA" available 
> for free?
> 
> As noted, the reference model may be freely downloaded.
> 
> >What am I to look for in the catalog at DISA?  How much does it cost?
> >Is this some not-ready-for-prime-time report that's being sold for an
> >arm-and-a-leg?
> 
> The approved X12.7 standard appears currently to only be available as
> part
> of 005020.  I believe it may also be avaliable through other
> channels.  I'll post the details if I find out.
> 
> >The UBL stuff (documentation and schemas) is available
> >for *free* at the OASIS site.  If I wanted to "do" a purchase order -
> >today - in XML, assured that the model and schemas conform to ebXML
> >CCTS
> >[ISO 15000(-5)] and ISO 11179 , would I have any choice but to use
> >OASIS' UBL?
> 
> Sure you would have choices!  You could create your own XML PO that
> complied with those specs.  But if you don't want to do that, I'm not
> aware
> at this point of any choices other than UBL.  I'm sure UN/CEFACT, X12,
> and
> perhaps other bodies will be able to present you with other choices
> eventually.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
> www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
> Using XML with Legacy Business Applications (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
> www.awprofessional.com/titles/0321154940
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .  
> Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject 
> prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 


.  
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to