OK.
transactions of one type (eg 850) will be in one GS-GS. I'll not use the group 
type.
A ISA-IEA will have one GS-GE

kind regards
Henk-Jan Ebbers

Hurd, Richard [SLCUS] wrote:
>>> However if you are sending me 500 invoices, for instance,
> I would greatly appreciate it if you would combine them all under one IN
> group and in one ISA otherwise you are giving me an excess number of files
> to archive. <<
> 
> this is not necessarily true with all translators.  My translator, for 
> example, batches ALL input transactions for a particular inbound run in a 
> single file.
> 
> Annoying, yes, if you come from file-based interchanges; but it actually 
> makes searching a lot easier.  :)
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Samantha Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 4:32 PM
> To: henkjanebbers
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [EDI-L] more questions about X12 (building open source x12
> translator)
> 
> 
> 1.  If you are using N2 as your format that is an implied decimal two
> positions to the left so 1.0 would look like "100" and .01 would look like
> "1".  Only the trailing zeroes are significant.  You may choose to pad that
> field's empty spaces with zeros or spaces as you like in your application
> layouts but EDI is all about using the smallest amount of data to
> communicate the information so you never pad your data on the EDI side*.
> *unless your customer doesn't know any better and wants it that when in
> which case you give them exactly what they want.
> 
> 2. Yes you may have only one group per ISA.  Our translator (GIS) always
> makes one group (GS-GE) per ISA no matter what.  Even though the standard
> says there may be many, ASN's always go in one and FA's in another each with
> their own ISA.  Most people using a real EDI translator will hardly even
> notice the difference as long as what you do follows the standards.  Its
> perfectly legitimate to have one ST transaction inside one GS group inside
> one ISA envelope.  However if you are sending me 500 invoices, for instance,
> I would greatly appreciate it if you would combine them all under one IN
> group and in one ISA otherwise you are giving me an excess number of files
> to archive.  Its not functionally wrong but its annoying.  It is also
> permissible to put many (properly formed) ISA's inside a single document
> that you send, again most real translators won't even notice because parsing
> data is what they are designed to do.  That is what the batches from the VAN
> would look like back when we used to connect once an hour and pull a batch.
> 
> 
> The ISA changed slightly at version 4030 with the release character but that
> was just changing how a particular element was used, not the length.  I
> haven't had to use much past version 4030 to notice other tweaks.  If you
> changed the ISA length it would break the system.  That ISA is the key to
> reading everything that follows it and so it must remain functionally the
> same regardless of the version used.
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/19/07, henkjanebbers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>   First, thanks for all of your answers. They were very helpful.
>> We have a working SEF to Bots-format converter. This save a lot of time,
>> our grammar for the x12 order (850)is over 13000 lines!
>> I can read and write x12 now, but have to improve some things.
>>
>> So my questions are:
>>
>> 1. If a field with format N2 contains only one digit, say '1', how do
>> I interpret this? As '0.01'?
>>
>> 2. In a functional group (GS-GE) I can expect more than one
>> Transaction Set type, as long as their Group Type is the same (is
>> first field in GS (GS01, Functional Identifier Code). OK, no problem.
>> But generating x12 is harder. Questions:
>> - what if I use only one Transaction Set type in a functional group
>> (GS-GE)? Does anybody bother?
>> - what if I always put only one envelope in a functional group
>> (GS-GE)? Does anybody care?
>> - Is it possible in an x12 file to have more than one ISA?
>>
>> 3. Has the ISA segment ever been changed?
>>
>> best regards,
>> Henk-Jan Ebbers
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> ...
> Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
> <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> 
> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> 
> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix. 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
best regards,
Henk-Jan Ebbers

Bots open source edi software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bots.sourceforge.net


...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to