Brian, this has always been a biggest challenge for me to "read" what indeed 
he/she is up to whenever there's a pitch. The same genius once proposed a 
product from Sterling Commerce named Secure Proxy, one that you use for 
breaking communication sessions and perform message authentication in the DMZ. 
It was offered for free since we use GIS 4.3 & Sterling VAN. With all due 
respect to this product & service provider, I have to admit it was a complete 
PITA to configure this thing in our system and it literally complicated the 
whole communication system. Not to mention the kind of collaboration I had with 
the genius to build this thing up. All of a sudden Sterling came up as my good 
fortune stating that the product was free only for 3 mths. This made the 
management to hiccup & it didn't take more time for them to decide to 
decommission Secure Proxy. And here in the proposal of encryption & SOX, he was 
completely true and honest.
 
Regards
Praveen

--- On Wed, 9/17/08, Brian Lehrhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Brian Lehrhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Encryption or Clear Text
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 3:43 AM

The "Sterling genius" is selling something.  Do you need to buy it?  
Depending on your data content, do you really care who looks at it
or what it says?  SOX is just another complication of life that most of 
us really don't need.

Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
>  
> I was fed up last week runing into a debate with a Sterling C:D consultant
on SOX compliance. We solely use Sterling Commerce VAN for transmitting all EDI
messages to our trading partners. Open FTP with no encryption is being used for
sending/receiving messages to/from from Sterling VAN. As per the Sterling
genius, all messages going out of the organization should be encrypted
irrespective of the destination - whether VAN or the partner else I don't
comply to SOX guidelines. Counter to this point, I argued that with just one
single destination, there is no requirement of having this additional step and
its an unnecessary overhead. Any thoughts?
>  
> Regards
> Praveen
>  
>
>
>       
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ...
> Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix:
<SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>,
<EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
>
> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work:
<JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>   

-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Brian Lehrhoff, EA ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Messaging Consultant  201-913-4506

Upgrade your Quickbooks for 20% off at http://ea.brianlehrhoff.com
Circular 230 Notice is located at http://ea.brianlehrhoff.com/230notice.html
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%




      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to