100% of the smart ones who defined it as the spec defines it
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:34 PM, jimdivoky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Scenario:
> 800 pound gorilla sends an outbound message using established EDI standards
> like X12 and EDIFACT. They add a second REF/RFF segment within a repeating
> REF/RFF segment loop which currently contains one mandatory segment as
> specified in their IG. The recipient does not need to do anything with the
> new segment.
>
> Question:
> What percentage of the TPs receiving the message with the additional
> REF/RFF segment would not have to make any changes to their data structure
> and/or map?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim Divoky
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>,
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
