I understand that the IG can cover all contingencies, however, the DATA should 
contain only relevant information.  Data, as we all know, comes from ERP 
systems 
(or other, similar applications).  IMO, a properly set up and maintained ERP 
system should not generate extraneous or irrelevant or worse, inaccurate or 
misleading information.


Leah





________________________________
From: Ken Etter <[email protected]>
To: Jason McMahon <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 2:32:40 PM
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Re: Effect of adding a new segment

  
And it simplifies mapping on the sender side...   
 
Can you imagine having to do a separate 850 map for each TP of the 800lb 
gorilla??
 
Ken
[email protected]
 

From: Jason McMahon <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2011 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: [EDI-L] Re: Effect of adding a new segment

  
Simple. TPs often create the same document format to cover all known
requirements and send them to everyone on their list. The other reason is
to satisfy ERP requirements.

I work with a vendor who has no pick ups. Everything is shipped. But I
receive any number of 850s with pick up dates. All the TPs know the vendor
has no pick ups but that doesn't stop them from sending the segment.

Sincerely,

Jason McMahon

8079 Village Drive

Cincinnati, OH 45242-4315

<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

http://gutausse.weebly.com/articles.html

<http://gutausse.blogspot.com> http://gutausse.blogspot.com

<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b>
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jason-mcmahon/11/743/51b

You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to
one person.

_____ 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leah
Halpin
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:03 PM
To: Ben Kenoyer; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Re: Effect of adding a new segment

Ben brings up an excellent point. Why send data that doesn't need to be
used?
Leah

________________________________
From: Ben Kenoyer <[email protected] <mailto:bkenoyer%40scvl.com> >
To: [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 12:54:59 PM
Subject: [EDI-L] Re: Effect of adding a new segment

Jim:
I would say close to 0% would not have to make any changes to their data 
structure and/or map. My system will more than likely ignore an unexpected 
[new/additional] segment, even if it's within a repeating loop. So, if the 
gorilla sends a new/unexpected segment, the file may process through my
system 
successfully, but without mapping that new value to a destination field in
my 
internal database or ERP, it doesn't benefit either partner if the data is
not 
being "used".

Sounds like the gorilla should work on its vocabulary and spell out its
intended 
segment and definition to all affected TPs ;-)

--- In [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> , Samantha
Scott <mossmuncher@...> wrote:
>
> 100% of the smart ones who defined it as the spec defines it
> 
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:34 PM, jimdivoky <jim.divoky@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Scenario:
> > 800 pound gorilla sends an outbound message using established EDI
standards
> > like X12 and EDIFACT. They add a second REF/RFF segment within a
repeating
> > REF/RFF segment loop which currently contains one mandatory segment as
> > specified in their IG. The recipient does not need to do anything with
the
> > new segment.
> >
> > Question:
> > What percentage of the TPs receiving the message with the additional
> > REF/RFF segment would not have to make any changes to their data
structure
> > and/or map?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jim Divoky
> >
> > 
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to