Hi, I would say that on a 944 it is not all that useful. If you don't match on product ID then you are going to have to contact the warehouse to work it out. Are you using the related 94n warehouse transactions? If you put the descriptions on all of them if adds up. Tim
--- On Wed, 5/1/13, need2know711 <[email protected]> wrote: From: need2know711 <[email protected]> Subject: [EDI-L] Description Fields. Include or not Include? To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, May 1, 2013, 7:17 AM I'm would like to get the groups opinion on inclusion of description fields. I recently created a 944 (warehouse stock transfer receipt advice) specification and I included the line item descriptions. My trading partner resisted, and felt they were not needed since we passing the part number ID. I like to include them as sort of a double check in any issues arise with the part number. My trading partner felt we could save the extra VAN cost if we did not include them and that they were unnecessary. Whats the groups take on descriptions? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
