In message <[email protected]>, [email protected] writes >I thought GS Control Number is ACK or NAK in AK1-02 and Transaction Set >Control Number is ACK or NAK in AK2-02. And, we should just use the >next ISA control number and next GS number. > That is my understanding as well, and seems to be how it is implemented in the examples I have encountered.
>Is the ISA control number still "meaningful" if TP exchange messages >directly via FTP without going through a VAN ? How important is the GS >control number in this case? I think you have answered your own question already! The ISA control number is meaningful if you receive a 997 response; independent of the method used to transfer the interchange. The data content of the interchange could be so corrupt as to prevent it being used for identification, and EDI software tends to log traffic using the various control numbers as keys. Regards Chris -- Chris Johnson mobile:+44 (0)7785 302122 Fax: +44 (0)870 0519 818 EDI website http://www.edimatrix.co.uk EDIMatrix Ltd work: 0844 414 6386 or +44 20 8778 1402 Registered in UK no. 2777624 Reg.Office: 34 Sydenham Rd, London SE26 5QF ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
