On 07/22/15 23:04, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 7/22/2015 3:00 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Without an estimate, it's impossible to tell if a placeholder branch >> will "pay off". :( > > I wish we could take this opportunity to just push forward with > migrating off SF altogether - whether to Github, Bitbucket, etc. or a > new server somewhere. This way, we'll have to incur another > disruption/change when we do move.
Intel are still investigating how subversion can be replaced: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/77/focus=89 On 07/19/15 18:56, Jordan Justen wrote: > On 2015-07-19 04:08:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> I've been under the impression that the "general consensus" was to >> stick with the SVN repo, because > > I don't think that is Intel's plan. Instead I think we are trying to > re-evaluate our git plans based on the community feedback. I agree that this would be a good opportunity though. Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
