On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:33 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/02/15 01:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On 2 September 2015 at 00:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 11:59 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > This adds support for the Intel BDS, by introducing a define > > > > 'USE_ARM_BDS' which defaults to TRUE, and can be overridden on > > > > the build command line. > > > > > > Out of curiosity (still in the process of getting my head around > > > the > > > BDS stuff for my POWER port) ... why not the "Universal" BDS with > > > separate UiApp ? Or is the IntelBDS a better option for some > > > reason ? > > > > > > > Excellent question. > > Yeah. Ben is disturbingly well informed. I wish my first emails to > these lists had been this much to the point! ;>
Heh thanks :-) ../... > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/759 > > Version 2 needs a good deal of work (including splitting up the > patches > into a bunch of smaller ones, plus some easy modifications to the new > BDS library *class* under MdeModulePkg as well), but it certainly > looks > feasible. And once Ray's work converges, those patches and reviews > should teach us enough to do the ArmVirtPkg conversion ourselves. Interesting. I have something more/less working with the IntelBDS (though ugly) and not at all with MdeModulePkg but as I said, I mostly copy/pasted "stuff" around without quite understanding what I was doing at this stage, so looking at how you guys transition will be useful. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
