On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 01:31 +0000, Long, Qin wrote:
> 
> This patch looks a little complicated. I may need some times to
> evaluate it.
> 
> One big changes may be the TS support part. We use our self-owned TS
> interface (leveraging the underlying ASN1 macro and PKCS7 routines)
> for UEFI timestamp support, instead of OpenSSL TS functions which
> cannot meet UEFI TS scenario. In theory, there should have no this
> kind of link issues (duplicated macro definitions) based on the
> current implementation.  

Hm, I must have missed that. What precisely do we need that the
upstream TS functions don't give us? 

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
[email protected]                              Intel Corporation

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to