David, Can you provide some revised text you would like to see in step 6.
I agree that we need to use the tools in ways that help make this easy, prevent errors, and preserve history. Given that step 6 describes promoting a feature from edk2-staging repo to edk2 repo, what set of git operations you would recommend? Thanks, Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David > Woodhouse > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 3:48 PM > To: Mangefeste, Tony <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <edk2- > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [edk2] EDK2 Staging Repository 2nd Draft > > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 22:38 +0000, Mangefeste, Tony wrote: > > Yes there is work that is substantial enough. > > I'm not sure what that's an answer to; you didn't leave a specific part > of my email above it as context. > > I was saying that *when* work is substantial enough to warrant such > staging, that is *precisely* the kind of work where we want to be using > the tools properly and *pull* it in rather than rebasing it. > > -- > David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre > [email protected] Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
