On 03/22/16 06:59, Jordan Justen wrote:
> Why not a guid based event, similar to gIdleLoopEventGuid?

I posted a prereq series for this:

  [edk2] [PATCH 0/6] introduce EfiEventGroupSignal(),
                     rebase ArmVirtPkg and OvmfPkg
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/9579

If it is "warmly received", I will do what you suggest.

Otherwise I would like to stick with the non-standard protocol in this
series. Installing a protocol interface in BDS is trivial (1 or 2
lines); signaling an event group is much more busywork, especially
considering that we're already doing that for End-of-DXE. So, with the
above pre-req series in place, implementing your idea here would improve
things; without the pre-req series it would duplicate more code.

Thanks!
Laszlo

> On 2016-03-21 03:19:06, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/21/16 10:58, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>>> But by all means, let's decouple this from the review of this series.
>>
>> Thanks. Two recent Protocol/*.h additions were a48d0a3d72f9 and
>> 78741ce91e12, those also added the extern declarations. I agree the
>> declarations shouldn't be duplicated, but then we should all start
>> following this new rule.
>>
> 
> Maybe one of you should post an email with a more noticable subject to
> prompt discussion of this topic more globally on edk2-devel?
> 
> -Jordan
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to