On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:18:38AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 20/04/16 08:42, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >On 19 April 2016 at 17:11, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>ACPI 6.0 introduced LPI(Low Power Idle) states that provides an alternate
> >>method to describe processor idle states.
> >>
> >>LPI extensions leverages the processor container device(again introduced
> >>in ACPI 6.0) allowing to express which parts of the system are affected
> >>by a given LPI state. It defines the local power states for each node
> >>in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can use _LPI object to
> >>select a local power state for each level of processor hierarchy in the
> >>system.
> >>
> >>This patch adds LPI support on Juno.
> >>
> >>Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> >>Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
> >>Cc: Leif Lindholm <[email protected]>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
> >
> >As for patch #1, I cannot review or test this.
>
> This currently can't be tested with mainline kernel yet.
> The patches to support this are still under review
So, should it be merged anyway, or will that break something?
Regardless, sounds like it should be split from the preceding two
patches.
/
Leif
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
