Jordan, Is anyone still using UnixPkg? If not, then maybe it should be moved to Deprecated.
I agree that Nt32Pkg functionality needs to be added to EmulatorPkg, but that is not what is supported today. Once that work is done, then I agree that Nt32Pkg should be moved to Deprecated. There could be other environments in the future that are not real HW, but are emulation or simulation of a UEFI/PI execution environments. That was one of the reasons I created an Emulated directory. If we think those could all go into Common or a Vendor specific directory in the future, then I have no issues with removing Emulated and moving EmulatorPkg to Common. Thanks, Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Justen, Jordan L > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:13 AM > To: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > Kinney, > Michael D <[email protected]> > Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC V2] Proposal to organize packages into directories > > On 2016-05-25 19:03:38, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > > edk2 > > Platform > > Common > > DuetPkg > > OvmfPkg > > CorebootPayloadPkg > > Emulated > > EmulatorPkg > > Nt32Pkg > > UnixPkg > > UnixPkg has been replaced by EmulatorPkg. > > I think EmulatorPkg and Nt32Pkg should be moved under Common. > > EmultorPkg's name makes it clear what it is. > > NT32 should be merged into EmulatorPkg as another 'host' and then > deprecated. > > So, I don't think we need an 'Emulated' directory. > > -Jordan _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
